BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11259475)

  • 1. Re: Cost-effectiveness studies fan colonoscopy debate.
    Spratt JS
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2001 Mar; 93(6):480. PubMed ID: 11259475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness studies fan colonoscopy debate.
    Newman L
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Nov; 92(22):1796-8. PubMed ID: 11078753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of endoscopic screening methods.
    Brenner H
    Z Gastroenterol; 2008 Apr; 46 Suppl 1():S20-2. PubMed ID: 18368634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is colorectal cancer surveillance cost-effective in patients with ulcerative colitis?
    Onken JE
    Inflamm Bowel Dis; 2008 Oct; 14 Suppl 2():S196-7. PubMed ID: 18816726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Surveillance and cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in asymptomatic increased risk subjects of colorectal cancer: Ferrara experience].
    Matarese V; Pezzoli A; Trevisani L; Boccia S; Brancaleoni M; Simone L; Feo C; Gullini S
    Recenti Prog Med; 2004; 95(7-8):352-7. PubMed ID: 15303544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speaking for the evidence: colonoscopy vs computed tomographic colonography.
    Harris R
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Aug; 102(16):1212-4. PubMed ID: 20651321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.
    Budenholzer B; Welch HG
    JAMA; 2001 Jan 24-31; 285(4):407; author reply 408. PubMed ID: 11242411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Colorectal carcinoma].
    Rambow A
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2002 Jun; 127(23):1278. PubMed ID: 12053293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Divergent understanding of health professionals regarding correct subsequent management of an asymptomatic patient with a positive faecal occult blood test and negative colonoscopy with resultant cost implications.
    Beswick L; Ting A; Macrae F; Dowling D; Hair C
    Intern Med J; 2014 Dec; 44(12a):1264-5. PubMed ID: 25442767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Summaries for patients. Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendations from the United States Preventive Services Task Force.
    Ann Intern Med; 2002 Jul; 137(2):I38. PubMed ID: 12118986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer; cost-effectiveness of screening colorectal cancer in the general population.
    Lieberman D
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2001 Oct; 54(4):537-8. PubMed ID: 11601425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer.
    Chelmowski MK
    Ann Intern Med; 2001 Aug; 135(3):218; author reply 219. PubMed ID: 11487491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer.
    Budenholzer B; Welch HG
    Ann Intern Med; 2001 Aug; 135(3):219. PubMed ID: 11487493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What is the most cost-effective screening regimen for colon cancer?
    Griffith S; Kane KY
    J Fam Pract; 2001 Jan; 50(1):13. PubMed ID: 11195472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Re: improving the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.
    Loeve F; Brown ML; Boer R; Habbema JD
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Oct; 92(20):1691-2. PubMed ID: 11036117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mathematical models and cost-effective screening strategies for colorectal cancer.
    Smith RA
    CMAJ; 2010 Sep; 182(12):1283-4. PubMed ID: 20713572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screening for colorectal cancer: which test can we afford?
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; van Ballegooijen M; Kuipers EJ
    Z Gastroenterol; 2008 Apr; 46 Suppl 1():S38-40. PubMed ID: 18368641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Colorectal cancer in Germany. Means for prevention and early detection: implications for laiety and physicians].
    Eickhoff A; Maar C; Birkner B; Riemann JF
    Internist (Berl); 2003 Mar; 44(3):278, 281-6. PubMed ID: 12731414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lag in colorectal screening rates prompts innovation.
    Bowdy M
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1998 Jun; 90(12):886-7. PubMed ID: 9637137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography or fecal blood tests.
    Heresbach D; Chauvin P; Grolier J; Josselin JM
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 Nov; 22(11):1372-9. PubMed ID: 20802341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.