134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11261461)
1. Aging and contralateral suppression effects on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
Parthasarathy TK
J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Feb; 12(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 11261461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of age on speech recognition in noise and on contralateral transient evoked otoacoustic emission suppression.
Yilmaz ST; Sennaroğlu G; Sennaroğlu L; Köse SK
J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Nov; 121(11):1029-34. PubMed ID: 17381896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contralateral suppression of transient otoacoustic emissions and sentence recognition in noise in young adults.
Stuart A; Butler AK
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Oct; 23(9):686-96. PubMed ID: 23072961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Clinically Viable Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Assay Using Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.
Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Marshall L; Perez ZD; Villabona T
Ear Hear; 2024 Jan-Feb 01; 45(1):115-129. PubMed ID: 37475147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
Berlin CI; Hood LJ; Wen H; Szabo P; Cecola RP; Rigby P; Jackson DF
Hear Res; 1993 Dec; 71(1-2):1-11. PubMed ID: 8113128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of age on contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in human listeners with normal hearing.
Kim S; Frisina DR; Frisina RD
Audiol Neurootol; 2002; 7(6):348-57. PubMed ID: 12401966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in children with sickle cell disease.
Stuart A; Preast JL
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):421-9. PubMed ID: 22246207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults with normal hearing.
Uchida Y; Ando F; Shimokata H; Sugiura S; Ueda H; Nakashima T
Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 18595184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance.
Norton SJ; Gorga MP; Widen JE; Folsom RC; Sininger Y; Cone-Wesson B; Vohr BR; Mascher K; Fletcher K
Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):508-28. PubMed ID: 11059707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans: intensity effects.
Hood LJ; Berlin CI; Hurley A; Cecola RP; Bell B
Hear Res; 1996 Nov; 101(1-2):113-8. PubMed ID: 8951438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contralateral acoustic suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions--activation of the medial olivocochlear system.
Komazec Z; Filipović D; Milosević D
Med Pregl; 2003; 56(3-4):124-30. PubMed ID: 12899075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tone-burst and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in subjects with hearing loss above 0.25, 0.5, and 1 kHz.
Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Trzaskowski B; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):757-67. PubMed ID: 22710662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The influence of aging on otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing subjects].
Lisowska G; Namysłowski G; Orecka B; Misiołek M; Scierski W; Czecior E
Otolaryngol Pol; 2007; 61(5):796-800. PubMed ID: 18552022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Influence of Efferent Inhibition on Speech Perception in Noise: A Revisit Through Its Level-Dependent Function.
Yashaswini L; Maruthy S
Am J Audiol; 2019 Aug; 28(2S):508-515. PubMed ID: 31461336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
Hoth S
Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of various durations of noise exposure on auditory brainstem response, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in rats.
Fraenkel R; Freeman S; Sohmer H
Audiol Neurootol; 2001; 6(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 11173774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The relationship between auditory threshold and evoked otoacoustic emissions.
Wagner W; Plinkert PK
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1999; 256(4):177-88. PubMed ID: 10337508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Contralateral modification of transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions].
Ganz M; von Specht H; Kevanishvili Z
Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 May; 76(5):278-83. PubMed ID: 9280414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of ageing on otoacoustic emissions and efferent suppression in humans.
Quaranta N; Debole S; Di Girolamo S
Audiology; 2001; 40(6):308-12. PubMed ID: 11781043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
