These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11262856)

  • 1. [Can donor insemination be optimised?].
    Wainer R; Fagnani F
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2001 Feb; 29(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 11262856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cervical insemination versus intra-uterine insemination of donor sperm for subfertility.
    Besselink DE; Farquhar C; Kremer JA; Marjoribanks J; O'Brien P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Apr; (2):CD000317. PubMed ID: 18425862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intrauterine insemination with frozen sperm increases pregnancy rates in donor insemination cycles under gonadotropin stimulation.
    Matorras R; Gorostiaga A; Diez J; Corcóstegui B; Pijoan JI; Ramón O; Rodriguez-Escudero FJ
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Mar; 65(3):620-5. PubMed ID: 8774298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The value of single versus repeated insemination in intra-uterine donor insemination cycles.
    Khalifa Y; Redgment CJ; Tsirigotis M; Grudzinskas JG; Craft IL
    Hum Reprod; 1995 Jan; 10(1):153-4. PubMed ID: 7745046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intrauterine insemination or intracervical insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle: a cohort study.
    Kop PA; van Wely M; Mol BW; de Melker AA; Janssens PM; Arends B; Curfs MH; Kortman M; Nap A; Rijnders E; Roovers JP; Ruis H; Simons AH; Repping S; van der Veen F; Mochtar MH
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Mar; 30(3):603-7. PubMed ID: 25637621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective randomized comparison of intrauterine and intracervical insemination with donor spermatozoa.
    Wainer R; Merlet F; Ducot B; Bailly M; Tribalat S; Lombroso R
    Hum Reprod; 1995 Nov; 10(11):2919-22. PubMed ID: 8747045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Intrauterine and intracervical insemination with frozen donor semen. A comparative study].
    Westergaard LG
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1991 Sep; 153(38):2621-3. PubMed ID: 1949268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fallopian tube sperm perfusion used in a donor insemination programme.
    Kahn JA; von Düring V; Sunde A; Molne K
    Hum Reprod; 1992 Jul; 7(6):806-12. PubMed ID: 1500479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intra-uterine versus cervical insemination of donor sperm for subfertility.
    O'Brien P; Vandekerckhove P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD000317. PubMed ID: 10796709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultrasound in the timing of artificial insemination with frozen donor semen.
    Saaranen M; Suhonen M; Saarikoski S
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1986; 22(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 3536682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Artificial insemination: a comparison of pregnancy rates with intrauterine versus cervical insemination and washed sperm versus serum swim-up sperm preparations.
    Urry RL; Middleton RG; Jones K; Poulson M; Worley R; Keye W
    Fertil Steril; 1988 Jun; 49(6):1036-8. PubMed ID: 3371481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A 3 year retrospective review of intrauterine insemination, using cryopreserved donor spermatozoa and cycle monitoring by urinary or serum luteinizing hormone measurements.
    Horne G; Jamaludin A; Critchlow JD; Falconer DA; Newman MC; Oghoetuoma J; Pease EH; Lieberman BA
    Hum Reprod; 1998 Nov; 13(11):3045-8. PubMed ID: 9853853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective, randomized, cross-over comparison of two methods of artificial insemination by donor on the incidence of conception: intracervical insemination by straw versus cervical cap.
    Flierman PA; Hogerzeil HV; Hemrika DJ
    Hum Reprod; 1997 Sep; 12(9):1945-8. PubMed ID: 9363712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intrauterine insemination outperforms intracervical insemination in a randomized, controlled study with frozen, donor semen.
    Patton PE; Burry KA; Thurmond A; Novy MJ; Wolf DP
    Fertil Steril; 1992 Mar; 57(3):559-64. PubMed ID: 1740198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors affecting the success of artificial insemination by frozen donor semen.
    Wong AW; Ho PC; Kwan M; Ma HK
    Int J Fertil; 1989; 34(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 2565300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does intrauterine insemination offer an advantage to cervical cap insemination in a donor insemination program?
    Williams DB; Moley KH; Cholewa C; Odem RR; Willand J; Gast MJ
    Fertil Steril; 1995 Feb; 63(2):295-8. PubMed ID: 7843434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pregnancy rates after double versus single insemination with frozen donor semen.
    Centola GM; Mattox JH; Raubertas RF
    Fertil Steril; 1990 Dec; 54(6):1089-92. PubMed ID: 2245834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Should an intrauterine insemination with donor semen be performed 1 or 2 days after the spontaneous LH rise? A prospective RCT.
    Blockeel C; Knez J; Polyzos NP; De Vos M; Camus M; Tournaye H
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Apr; 29(4):697-703. PubMed ID: 24549212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The more accurate timing of insemination with regard to ovulation does not create a significant improvement in pregnancy rates in a donor insemination program.
    Brook PF; Barratt CL; Cooke ID
    Fertil Steril; 1994 Feb; 61(2):308-13. PubMed ID: 8299788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intrauterine insemination-ready versus conventional semen cryopreservation for donor insemination: a comparison of retrospective results and a prospective, randomized trial.
    Wolf DP; Patton PE; Burry KA; Kaplan PF
    Fertil Steril; 2001 Jul; 76(1):181-5. PubMed ID: 11438340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.