BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11263229)

  • 21. [A study on the contralateral suppressive effects of distortion product otoacoustic emissions].
    Wang H; Zhong N
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Nov; 11(11):489-92. PubMed ID: 10323015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: time course of recovery and effects of lowering L2.
    Sutton LA; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK; Whitehead ML
    Hear Res; 1994 May; 75(1-2):161-74. PubMed ID: 8071143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Alternative distortion product otoacoustic emissions and hearing loss in a clinical population.
    Lind O
    Scand Audiol; 1999; 28(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 10572971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in White Leghorn chickens (Gallus domesticus): effects of frequency ratio and relative level.
    Burkard R; Salvi R; Chen L
    Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(4):197-213. PubMed ID: 9390802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A systematic review of stimulus parameters for eliciting distortion product otoacoustic emissions from adult humans.
    Petersen L; Wilson WJ; Kathard H
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Jun; 56(6):382-391. PubMed ID: 28635500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Parameters to maximize 2f2-f1 distortion product otoacoustic emission levels.
    Horn JH; Pratt SR; Durrant JD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Dec; 51(6):1620-9. PubMed ID: 18664689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing young humans].
    Dan H; Ni D; Li F
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 1998 Jun; 20(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 11367707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of primary-level and primary-frequency ratios on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Johnson TA; Neely ST; Garner CA; Gorga MP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jan; 119(1):418-28. PubMed ID: 16454296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of furosemide on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and on neuronal responses in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus.
    Rübsamen R; Mills DM; Rubel EW
    J Neurophysiol; 1995 Oct; 74(4):1628-38. PubMed ID: 8989399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Distortion product of otoacoustic emissions in normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss].
    Schlögel H; Stephan K; Böheim K; Welzl-Müller K
    HNO; 1995 Jan; 43(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 7890546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Average optimal DPOAE primary tone levels in normal-hearing adults.
    Marcrum SC; Kummer P; Kreitmayer C; Steffens T
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(6):325-32. PubMed ID: 27010374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Exploring Optimal Stimulus Frequency Ratio for Measurement of the Quadratic f2-f1 Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission in Humans.
    Baiduc RR; Dhar S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 61(7):1794-1806. PubMed ID: 29946695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Peri-uvulopalatopharyng oplasty otoacoustic emissions in patients with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome].
    She WD; Zhang Q; Chen F; Jiang P; Wang J
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Jan; 39(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 15127570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and basilar membrane vibration in the 6-9 kHz region of sensitive chinchilla cochleae.
    Rhode WS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2725-37. PubMed ID: 18189565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Research on the basic properties of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions].
    Liu B; Liu C; Guo L; Zhao X
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Oct; 18(10):590-2. PubMed ID: 15620134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Measurement of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in guinea pig].
    Yang Y; Kong W; Zhang W
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Sep; 15(9):411-3. PubMed ID: 12541893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: distortion product otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period.
    Gorga MP; Norton SJ; Sininger YS; Cone-Wesson B; Folsom RC; Vohr BR; Widen JE; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):400-24. PubMed ID: 11059701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of ear-canal standing waves on measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Whitehead ML; Stagner BB; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3200-14. PubMed ID: 8550945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Generation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in infants with a combined air and bone conduction stimulus.
    Lalos T; Dobrev I; Probst R; Röösli C
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Aug; 171():111628. PubMed ID: 37329704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.