These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11264052)

  • 1. When parties and candidates collide: citizen perception of house candidates' positions on abortion.
    Koch JW
    Public Opin Q; 2001; 65(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 11264052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Multiple-Matching Perspective on Value Versus Identity: Investigating How Political Ideology and Party Identity Contribute to Citizens' Support for Political Candidates.
    Bai H
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2024 Jan; 50(1):58-77. PubMed ID: 36113113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abortion and the 1978 Congressional elections.
    Traugott MW; Vinovskis MA
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1980; 12(5):238-46. PubMed ID: 7439348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.
    Westfall J; Van Boven L; Chambers JR; Judd CM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Mar; 10(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 25910386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When the Party Decides: The Effects of Facial Competence and Dominance on Internal Nominations of Political Candidates.
    Laustsen L; Petersen MB
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704917732005. PubMed ID: 29911407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental tests of an attitudinal theory of the gender gap in voting.
    Eagly AH; Diekman AB; Schneider MC; Kulesa P
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Oct; 29(10):1245-58. PubMed ID: 15189586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Seeing Red: Anger Increases How Much Republican Identification Predicts Partisan Attitudes and Perceived Polarization.
    Huber M; Van Boven L; Park B; Pizzi WT
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0139193. PubMed ID: 26407321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The abortion issue in the 1980 elections.
    Granberg D; Burlison J
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(5):231-8. PubMed ID: 6653742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproductive rights on firmer ground with prochoice White House, Congress. Special report -- abortion and the 1992 elections.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Nov; (18):1-2. PubMed ID: 12285933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Categorizing Two Taiwanese Major Political Parties From Their Faces: The Influence of Provincial Appearance.
    Chang CK; Ho MW; Chien SH
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():271. PubMed ID: 29618993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Partisan strength, political trust and generalized trust in the United States: An analysis of the General Social Survey, 1972-2014.
    Hooghe M; Oser J
    Soc Sci Res; 2017 Nov; 68():132-146. PubMed ID: 29108592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of stereotypes and individuating information in political person perception.
    Crawford JT; Jussim L; Madon S; Cain TR; Stevens ST
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Apr; 37(4):529-42. PubMed ID: 21343439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speaking two "Languages" in America: A semantic space analysis of how presidential candidates and their supporters represent abstract political concepts differently.
    Li P; Schloss B; Follmer DJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Oct; 49(5):1668-1685. PubMed ID: 28718087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does the sequence of rotations in Multiple Mini Interview stations influence the candidates' performance?
    Kim KJ; Kwon BS
    Med Educ Online; 2018 Dec; 23(1):1485433. PubMed ID: 29912677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How Candidates' Age and Gender Predict Voter Preference in a Hypothetical Election.
    Shen YA; Shoda Y
    Psychol Sci; 2021 Jun; 32(6):934-943. PubMed ID: 34018426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Political Ideology Modifies the Effect of Glass Cliff Candidacies on Election Outcomes for Women in American State Legislative Races (2011-2016).
    Robinson SL; Kulich C; Aelenei C; Iacoviello V
    Psychol Women Q; 2021 Jun; 45(2):155-177. PubMed ID: 34040281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Creating A Nationwide Nonpartisan Initiative for Family Caregivers in Political Party Platforms.
    Scribner B; Lynn J; Walker V; Morgan L; Montgomery A; Blair E; Baird D; Goldschmidt B; Kirschenbaum N
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2017 Jun; 65(6):1126-1131. PubMed ID: 28295135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Democratic and Republican physicians provide different care on politicized health issues.
    Hersh ED; Goldenberg MN
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Oct; 113(42):11811-11816. PubMed ID: 27698126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Partisan elites shape citizens' economic beliefs.
    Bisgaard M; Slothuus R
    Behav Brain Sci; 2018 Jan; 41():e164. PubMed ID: 31064492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial models of political competition with endogenous political parties.
    Laver M; Schilperoord M
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2007 Sep; 362(1485):1711-21. PubMed ID: 17428772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.