531 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11264102)
1. Comparison of sonography and CT for differentiating benign from malignant cervical lymph nodes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Sumi M; Ohki M; Nakamura T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):1019-24. PubMed ID: 11264102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Regional lymph node metastases in malignant tumors of the head and neck: value of diagnostic procedures].
Leicher-Düber A; Bleier R; Düber C; Thelen M
Laryngorhinootologie; 1991 Jan; 70(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 2025343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs. CT and MRI in palpable enlarged lymph nodes of the head and neck].
Schröder RJ; Rost B; Hidajat N; Rademaker J; Felix R; Mäurer J
Rofo; 2002 Sep; 174(9):1099-106. PubMed ID: 12221567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Necrosis in metastatic neck nodes: diagnostic accuracy of CT, MR imaging, and US.
King AD; Tse GM; Ahuja AT; Yuen EH; Vlantis AC; To EW; van Hasselt AC
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):720-6. PubMed ID: 14990838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of whole-body PET/CT, dedicated high-resolution head and neck PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced CT in preoperative staging of clinically M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Rodrigues RS; Bozza FA; Christian PE; Hoffman JM; Butterfield RI; Christensen CR; Heilbrun M; Wiggins RH; Hunt JP; Bentz BG; Hitchcock YJ; Morton KA
J Nucl Med; 2009 Aug; 50(8):1205-13. PubMed ID: 19617339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differentiation between benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes.
Holzapfel K; Duetsch S; Fauser C; Eiber M; Rummeny EJ; Gaa J
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Dec; 72(3):381-7. PubMed ID: 18995981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Sonography in cervical lymph node metastases].
Gritzmann N; Czembirek H; Hajek P; Karnel F; Türk R; Frühwald F
Radiologe; 1987 Mar; 27(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 3295982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Histologically controlled comparison of palpation and sonography in the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastases].
Eichhorn T; Schroeder HG; Glanz H; Schwerk WB
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1987 May; 66(5):266-74. PubMed ID: 3302569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Power Doppler sonography of cervical lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancer.
Ariji Y; Kimura Y; Hayashi N; Onitsuka T; Yonetsu K; Hayashi K; Ariji E; Kobayashi T; Nakamura T
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1998 Feb; 19(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 9504483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic evaluation of squamous cell carcinoma metastatic to cervical lymph nodes from an unknown head and neck primary site.
Cianchetti M; Mancuso AA; Amdur RJ; Werning JW; Kirwan J; Morris CG; Mendenhall WM
Laryngoscope; 2009 Dec; 119(12):2348-54. PubMed ID: 19718744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Cervical lymph node metastases: a histologically controlled comparison of palpation, sonography and computed tomography].
Leicher-Düber A; Bleier R; Düber C; Thelen M
Rofo; 1990 Nov; 153(5):575-9. PubMed ID: 2173066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. SPECT-CT for topographic mapping of sentinel lymph nodes prior to gamma probe-guided biopsy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Wagner A; Schicho K; Glaser C; Zettinig G; Yerit K; Lang S; Klug C; Leitha T
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2004 Dec; 32(6):343-9. PubMed ID: 15555515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combination of helical CT and Doppler sonography in the follow-up of patients with clinical N0 stage neck disease and oral cancer.
Eida S; Sumi M; Yonetsu K; Kimura Y; Nakamura T
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 Mar; 24(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 12637273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Computerized tomography of the soft tissue of the neck. Lymph nodes and their differential diagnosis. II: Clinical value of CT in lymph node staging].
Lenz M
Rontgenblatter; 1990 Jul; 43(7):312-20. PubMed ID: 2392650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contribution of doppler sonography blood flow information to the diagnosis of metastatic cervical nodes in patients with head and neck cancer: assessment in relation to anatomic levels of the neck.
Yonetsu K; Sumi M; Izumi M; Ohki M; Eida S; Nakamura T
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2001 Jan; 22(1):163-9. PubMed ID: 11158903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lymph node metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma from an unknown primary in the upper and middle neck: Impact of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography.
Deron PB; Bonte KM; Vermeersch HF; Van de Wiele C
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2011 Jun; 26(3):331-4. PubMed ID: 21711095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Reactive enlargement of cervical lymph nodes and cervical lymph node metastases: sonography (M/Q quotient) and computed tomography].
Steinkamp HJ; Zwicker C; Langer M; Mathe M; Ehritt C; Neumann K; Felix R
Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 Jul; 2(4):188-95. PubMed ID: 1504116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The node-negative neck: accuracy of clinical intraoperative lymph node assessment for metastatic disease in head and neck cancer.
Finn S; Toner M; Timon C
Laryngoscope; 2002 Apr; 112(4):630-3. PubMed ID: 12150514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Ultrasound evaluation of characteristics of cervical lymph nodes with special reference to color Doppler ultrasound. A contribution to differentiating reactive from metastatic lymph node involvement in the neck].
Issing PR; Kettling T; Kempf HG; Heermann R; Lenarz T
Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Oct; 78(10):566-72. PubMed ID: 10595342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Detection and assessment of cervical lymph node metastases in head-neck tumors. A comparison of methods].
Heppt W; Haels J; Lenarz T; Mende U; Gademann G
Laryngorhinootologie; 1989 Jun; 68(6):327-32. PubMed ID: 2662991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
