BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11264133)

  • 21. Comparing LEA numbers low vision book and Feinbloom visual acuity charts.
    Hardgrave N; Hatley J; Lewerenz D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Nov; 89(11):1611-8. PubMed ID: 23026789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The dependency of logMAR visual acuity measurements on chart design and scoring rule.
    Hazel CA; Elliott DB
    Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Dec; 79(12):788-92. PubMed ID: 12512687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of scoring and termination rules on test-retest variability of a novel high-pass letter acuity chart.
    Shah N; Dakin SC; Whitaker HL; Anderson RS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Mar; 55(3):1386-92. PubMed ID: 24519424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of varying the number of characters per row on the accuracy and reproducibility of the ETDRS visual acuity chart.
    Shamir RR; Friedman YG; Joskowicz L; Mimouni M; Blumenthal EZ
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 254(5):971-6. PubMed ID: 26743750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reliability of a modified logMAR distant visual acuity chart for routine clinical use.
    Noushad B; Thomas J; Amin SV
    Oman J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 5(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 22993462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Advising patients on visual fitness to drive: implications of revised DVLA regulations.
    Latham K; Katsou MF; Rae S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 99(4):545-8. PubMed ID: 25381011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Eye Phone Study: reliability and accuracy of assessing Snellen visual acuity using smartphone technology.
    Perera C; Chakrabarti R; Islam FM; Crowston J
    Eye (Lond); 2015 Jul; 29(7):888-94. PubMed ID: 25931170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Visual acuity loss in patients with age-related macular degeneration measured using a novel high-pass letter chart.
    Shah N; Dakin SC; Dobinson S; Tufail A; Egan CA; Anderson RS
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 100(10):1346-52. PubMed ID: 26846435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A new Gujarati language logMAR visual acuity chart: development and validation.
    Sailoganathan A; Siderov J; Osuobeni E
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 61(10):557-61. PubMed ID: 24212306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Comparison of different scoring terminations rules for visual acuity testing: from a computer simulation to a clinical study.
    Mimouni M; Shamir RR; Cohen AD; El-Yaniv R; Cohen MJ; Joskowicz L; Blumenthal EZ
    Curr Eye Res; 2019 Jul; 44(7):790-795. PubMed ID: 30829080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol.
    Beck RW; Moke PS; Turpin AH; Ferris FL; SanGiovanni JP; Johnson CA; Birch EE; Chandler DL; Cox TA; Blair RC; Kraker RT
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Feb; 135(2):194-205. PubMed ID: 12566024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is it time to confine Snellen charts to the annals of history?
    Lovie-Kitchin JE
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Nov; 35(6):631-6. PubMed ID: 26497296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [A chart for low visual acuities: experience in a center for low vision and rehabilitation].
    Bonavolonta P; Travade I; Forte R; Rebeyrotte I; Adenis JP; Robert PY
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2010 Jun; 33(6):391-6. PubMed ID: 20493585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does the EyeChart App for iPhones Give Comparable Measurements to Traditional Visual Acuity Charts?
    Ansell K; Maconachie G; Bjerre A
    Br Ir Orthopt J; 2020 Apr; 16(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 32999989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Comparison of the threshold interpolation and whole-line method on logMAR chart and Snellen chart for visual acuity testing].
    Veselý P; Ventruba J
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2009 Oct; 65(5):191-4. PubMed ID: 20052823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. REPRODUCIBILITY AND COMPARISON OF VISUAL ACUITY OBTAINED WITH SIGHTBOOK MOBILE APPLICATION TO NEAR CARD AND SNELLEN CHART.
    Phung L; Gregori NZ; Ortiz A; Shi W; Schiffman JC
    Retina; 2016 May; 36(5):1009-20. PubMed ID: 26509223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Design and Validation of a Novel Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test: The K-VA Test.
    Karampatakis V; Almaliotis D; Talimtzi P; Almpanidou S
    Ophthalmol Ther; 2023 Jun; 12(3):1657-1670. PubMed ID: 36961662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Validation of an automated-ETDRS near and intermediate visual acuity measurement.
    Pang Y; Sparschu L; Nylin E
    Clin Exp Optom; 2020 Sep; 103(5):663-667. PubMed ID: 31822041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A standardized logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity chart in Hindi.
    Sailoganathan A; Osuobeni EP; Siderov J
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 May; 66(5):634-640. PubMed ID: 29676304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Construction and validation of logMAR visual acuity charts in seven Indian languages.
    Negiloni K; Mazumdar D; Neog A; Das B; Medhi J; Choudhury M; George RJ; Ramani KK
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 May; 66(5):641-646. PubMed ID: 29676305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.