These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11264938)

  • 1. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microleakage of adhesive and nonadhesive luting cements for stainless steel crowns.
    Memarpour M; Mesbahi M; Rezvani G; Rahimi M
    Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(7):501-4. PubMed ID: 22353410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retention of gold alloy crowns cemented with traditional and resin cements.
    Pinzón LM; Frey GN; Winkler MM; Tate WH; Burgess JO; Powers JM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):351-3. PubMed ID: 19639070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of a resin-based sealer on crown retention for three types of cement.
    Johnson GH; Hazelton LR; Bales DJ; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):428-35. PubMed ID: 15153849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microleakage of cements for stainless steel crowns.
    Shiflett K; White SN
    Pediatr Dent; 1997; 19(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 9200198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
    Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations.
    Ayad MF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 19054303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of a pressure chamber to compare microleakage of three luting agents.
    Lyons KM; Rodda JC; Hood JA
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(5):426-33. PubMed ID: 9495161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of cement selection and finishing technique on marginal opening of cast gold inlays.
    Farrell CV; Johnson GH; Oswald MT; Tucker RD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 18395539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage of four core materials under complete cast crowns.
    Yesil ZD
    N Y State Dent J; 2007; 73(4):32-8. PubMed ID: 17891879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of indirect composite inlays cemented with four luting agents.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Loos-Ayav C; Jacquot B; Panighi MM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):563-70. PubMed ID: 15942618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
    da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Microleakage in Nanocomposite and Amalgam as a Crown Foundation Material Luted with Different Luting Cements under CAD-CAM Milled Metal Crowns: An In Vitro Microscopic Study.
    Amina ; Rajput G; Ahmed S; Chaturvedi S; Addas MK; Bhagat TV; Gurumurthy V; Alqahtani SM; Alobaid MA; Alsubaiy EF; Gupta K
    Polymers (Basel); 2022 Jun; 14(13):. PubMed ID: 35808655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of various cementing agents for full cast crowns.
    Piwowarczyk A; Lauer HC; Sorensen JA
    Dent Mater; 2005 May; 21(5):445-53. PubMed ID: 15826701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of different cements on the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of all-ceramic and fiber-reinforced crowns.
    Behr M; Rosentritt M; Mangelkramer M; Handel G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 14651242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 57.