BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11265678)

  • 1. Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability.
    Abbey CK; Barrett HH
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2001 Mar; 18(3):473-88. PubMed ID: 11265678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of human and Hotelling observer performance for a fan-beam CT signal detection task.
    Sanchez AA; Sidky EY; Reiser I; Pan X
    Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031104. PubMed ID: 23464284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Task-based model/human observer evaluation of SPIHT wavelet compression with human visual system-based quantization.
    Zhang Y; Pham BT; Eckstein MP
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):324-36. PubMed ID: 15766693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discrimination tasks in simulated low-dose CT noise.
    Abbey CK; Samuelson FW; Zeng R; Boone JM; Myers KJ; Eckstein MP
    Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 50(7):4151-4172. PubMed ID: 37057360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation between human observer performance and model observer performance in differential phase contrast CT.
    Li K; Garrett J; Chen GH
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111905. PubMed ID: 24320438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Classification images for localization performance in ramp-spectrum noise.
    Abbey CK; Samuelson FW; Zeng R; Boone JM; Eckstein MP; Myers K
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1970-1984. PubMed ID: 29532479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can the channelized Hotelling observer including aspects of the human visual system predict human observer performance in mammography?
    Bouwman RW; Goffi M; van Engen RE; Broeders MJ; Dance DR; Young KC; Veldkamp WJ
    Phys Med; 2017 Jan; 33():95-105. PubMed ID: 28040401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of internal noise methods for Hotelling observer models.
    Zhang Y; Pham BT; Eckstein MP
    Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3312-22. PubMed ID: 17879795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An investigation of the trade-off between the count level and image quality in myocardial perfusion SPECT using simulated images: the effects of statistical noise and object variability on defect detectability.
    He X; Links JM; Frey EC
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 55(17):4949-61. PubMed ID: 20693615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation between a 2D channelized Hotelling observer and human observers in a low-contrast detection task with multislice reading in CT.
    Yu L; Chen B; Kofler JM; Favazza CP; Leng S; Kupinski MA; McCollough CH
    Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):3990-3999. PubMed ID: 28555878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A performance comparison of anthropomorphic model observers for breast cone beam CT images: A single-slice and multislice study.
    Han M; Baek J
    Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3431-3441. PubMed ID: 31106432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of supervised-learning approaches for designing a channelized observer for image quality assessment in CT.
    Pouget E; Dedieu V
    Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 50(7):4282-4295. PubMed ID: 36647620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accounting for anatomical noise in search-capable model observers for planar nuclear imaging.
    Sen A; Gifford HC
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2016 Jan; 3(1):015502. PubMed ID: 26835503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of human observer performance in a 2-alternative forced choice low-contrast detection task using channelized Hotelling observer: impact of radiation dose and reconstruction algorithms.
    Yu L; Leng S; Chen L; Kofler JM; Carter RE; McCollough CH
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041908. PubMed ID: 23556902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 4D numerical observer for lesion detection in respiratory-gated PET.
    Lorsakul A; Li Q; Trott CM; Hoog C; Petibon Y; Ouyang J; Laine AF; El Fakhri G
    Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):102504. PubMed ID: 25281979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Model observers for assessment of image quality.
    Barrett HH; Yao J; Rolland JP; Myers KJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1993 Nov; 90(21):9758-65. PubMed ID: 8234311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pre-whitened matched filter and convolutional neural network based model observer performance for mass lesion detection in non-contrast breast CT.
    Lyu SH; Abbey CK; Hernandez AM; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2023 Dec; 50(12):7558-7567. PubMed ID: 37646463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toward image quality assessment in mammography using model observers: Detection of a calcification-like object.
    Bouwman RW; Mackenzie A; van Engen RE; Broeders MJM; Young KC; Dance DR; den Heeten GJ; Veldkamp WJH
    Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5726-5739. PubMed ID: 28837225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Numerical observer for atherosclerotic plaque classification in spectral computed tomography.
    Lorsakul A; Fakhri GE; Worstell W; Ouyang J; Rakvongthai Y; Laine AF; Li Q
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2016 Jul; 3(3):035501. PubMed ID: 27429999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The efficiency of the human observer for lesion detection and localization in emission tomography.
    Liu B; Zhou L; Kulkarni S; Gindi G
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(9):2651-66. PubMed ID: 19351977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.