These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11265926)

  • 1. The slope of the psychometric function for Bailey-Lovie letter charts: defocus effects and implications for modeling letter-by-letter scores.
    Carkeet A; Lee L; Kerr JR; Keung MM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2001 Feb; 78(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 11265926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Slope of psychometric functions and termination rule analysis for low contrast acuity charts.
    Carkeet A; Bailey IL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Mar; 37(2):118-127. PubMed ID: 28211180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of scoring and termination rules on test-retest variability of a novel high-pass letter acuity chart.
    Shah N; Dakin SC; Whitaker HL; Anderson RS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Mar; 55(3):1386-92. PubMed ID: 24519424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of optical defocus on the test-retest variability of visual acuity measurements.
    Rosser DA; Murdoch IE; Cousens SN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Apr; 45(4):1076-9. PubMed ID: 15037571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The dependency of logMAR visual acuity measurements on chart design and scoring rule.
    Hazel CA; Elliott DB
    Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Dec; 79(12):788-92. PubMed ID: 12512687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and validation of a visual acuity chart for Australian Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders.
    Wildsoet CF; Wood JM; Hassan S
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Nov; 75(11):806-12. PubMed ID: 9848834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling logMAR visual acuity scores: effects of termination rules and alternative forced-choice options.
    Carkeet A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2001 Jul; 78(7):529-38. PubMed ID: 11503943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual acuity results in school-aged children and adults: Lea Symbols chart versus Bailey-Lovie chart.
    Dobson V; Maguire M; Orel-Bixler D; Quinn G; Ying GS;
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Sep; 80(9):650-4. PubMed ID: 14502046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual acuity loss in patients with age-related macular degeneration measured using a novel high-pass letter chart.
    Shah N; Dakin SC; Dobinson S; Tufail A; Egan CA; Anderson RS
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 100(10):1346-52. PubMed ID: 26846435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of simulated refractive error on adult visual acuity for paediatric tests.
    Paudel N; Jacobs RJ; Sloan R; Denny S; Shea K; Thompson B; Anstice N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):521-530. PubMed ID: 28656671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual acuity testing. From the laboratory to the clinic.
    Bailey IL; Lovie-Kitchin JE
    Vision Res; 2013 Sep; 90():2-9. PubMed ID: 23685164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual acuity scored by the letter-by-letter or probit methods has lower retest variability than the line assignment method.
    Vanden Bosch ME; Wall M
    Eye (Lond); 1997; 11 ( Pt 3)():411-7. PubMed ID: 9373488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A standardized logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity chart in Hindi.
    Sailoganathan A; Osuobeni EP; Siderov J
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 May; 66(5):634-640. PubMed ID: 29676304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of visual acuity results in preschool children with lea symbols and Bailey-Lovie E chart.
    Sanker N; Dhirani S; Bhakat P
    Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2013; 20(4):345-8. PubMed ID: 24339687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Design of an Arabic near visual acuity chart.
    Oduntan AO; al-Abdulmunem MA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Mar; 17(2):158-60. PubMed ID: 9196680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distance word acuity, critical print size and driving vision standards.
    Rae S; Latham K; Katsou MF
    Clin Exp Optom; 2015 Sep; 98(5):459-63. PubMed ID: 26390909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Visual acuity measured via the Freiburg visual acuity test (FVT), Bailey Lovie chart and Landolt Ring chart].
    Wesemann W
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Sep; 219(9):660-7. PubMed ID: 12410466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Arabic letter distance visual acuity test chart for young children and illiterate adults.
    Oduntan AO; Briggs ST
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1999 Sep; 19(5):431-7. PubMed ID: 10768024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new Gujarati language logMAR visual acuity chart: development and validation.
    Sailoganathan A; Siderov J; Osuobeni E
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 61(10):557-61. PubMed ID: 24212306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of blur and subsequent adaptation on visual acuity using letter and Landolt C charts: differences between emmetropes and myopes.
    Poulere E; Moschandreas J; Kontadakis GA; Pallikaris IG; Plainis S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar; 33(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 23297779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.