195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11267854)
1. Mammographic size of ductal carcinoma in situ does not predict the presence of an invasive focus.
Wahedna Y; Evans AJ; Pinder SE; Ellis IO; Blamey RW; Geraghty JG
Eur J Cancer; 2001 Mar; 37(4):459-62. PubMed ID: 11267854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting invasion in mammographically detected microcalcification.
Bagnall MJ; Evans AJ; Wilson AR; Pinder SE; Denley H; Geraghty JG; Ellis IO
Clin Radiol; 2001 Oct; 56(10):828-32. PubMed ID: 11895299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictors of invasive disease in breast cancer when core biopsy demonstrates DCIS only.
Dillon MF; McDermott EW; Quinn CM; O'Doherty A; O'Higgins N; Hill AD
J Surg Oncol; 2006 Jun; 93(7):559-63. PubMed ID: 16705731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of the presence of invasive disease from the measurement of extent of malignant microcalcification on mammography and ductal carcinoma in situ grade at core biopsy.
O'Flynn EA; Morel JC; Gonzalez J; Dutt N; Evans D; Wasan R; Michell MJ
Clin Radiol; 2009 Feb; 64(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 19103348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic accuracy of core biopsy for ductal carcinoma in situ and its implications for surgical practice.
Dillon MF; Quinn CM; McDermott EW; O'Doherty A; O'Higgins N; Hill AD
J Clin Pathol; 2006 Jul; 59(7):740-3. PubMed ID: 16803949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictors of invasive breast cancer in mammographically detected microcalcification in patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia, atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ and recommendations for a selective approach to sentinel lymph node biopsy.
Catteau X; Simon P; Noël JC
Pathol Res Pract; 2012 Apr; 208(4):217-20. PubMed ID: 22445178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can Occult Invasive Disease in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Be Predicted Using Computer-extracted Mammographic Features?
Shi B; Grimm LJ; Mazurowski MA; Baker JA; Marks JR; King LM; Maley CC; Hwang ES; Lo JY
Acad Radiol; 2017 Sep; 24(9):1139-1147. PubMed ID: 28506510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A mass on breast imaging predicts coexisting invasive carcinoma in patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ.
King TA; Farr GH; Cederbom GJ; Smetherman DH; Bolton JS; Stolier AJ; Fuhrman GM
Am Surg; 2001 Sep; 67(9):907-12. PubMed ID: 11565774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammographic predictors of the presence and size of invasive carcinomas associated with malignant microcalcification lesions without a mass.
Stomper PC; Geradts J; Edge SB; Levine EG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Dec; 181(6):1679-84. PubMed ID: 14627596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Independent predictors of breast malignancy in screen-detected microcalcifications: biopsy results in 2545 cases.
Farshid G; Sullivan T; Downey P; Gill PG; Pieterse S
Br J Cancer; 2011 Nov; 105(11):1669-75. PubMed ID: 22052156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast ductal carcinoma in situ with micro-invasion versus ductal carcinoma in situ: a comparative analysis of clinicopathological and mammographic findings.
Zhang M; Lin Q; Su XH; Cui CX; Bian TT; Wang CQ; Zhao J; Li LL; Ma JZ; Huang JL
Clin Radiol; 2021 Oct; 76(10):787.e1-787.e7. PubMed ID: 34052010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of ultrasound and sonographically guided core biopsy in the diagnostic evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast.
Londero V; Zuiani C; Furlan A; Nori J; Bazzocchi M
Radiol Med; 2007 Sep; 112(6):863-76. PubMed ID: 17891529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictive factors for invasive cancer in surgical specimens following an initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ after stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in microcalcification-only lesions.
Gümüş H; Mills P; Fish D; Gümüş M; Cox K; Devalia H; Jones S; Jones P; Sever AR
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2016; 22(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 26509833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammographic extent of microcalcifications and oestrogen receptor expression affect preoperative breast carcinoma in situ size estimation.
Vernet-Tomas M; Mojal S; Gamero R; Nicolau P; Rodríguez-Arana A; Plancarte F; Corominas JM; Serrano-Munne L; Carreras R; Sabadell D
Breast Cancer; 2017 May; 24(3):466-472. PubMed ID: 27639877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammographic appearance of ductal carcinoma in situ does not reliably predict histologic subtype.
Slanetz PJ; Giardino AA; Oyama T; Koerner FC; Halpern EF; Moore RH; Kopans DB
Breast J; 2001; 7(6):417-21. PubMed ID: 11843854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitivity of breast MRI for ductal carcinoma in situ appearing as microcalcifications only on mammography.
Rinaldi P; Buccheri C; Giuliani M; Bufi E; Romani M; Patrolecco F; Belli P; Bonomo L
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(6):1207-1212. PubMed ID: 27618803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mixed-Methods Study to Predict Upstaging of DCIS to Invasive Disease on Mammography.
Grimm LJ; Neely B; Hou R; Selvakumaran V; Baker JA; Yoon SC; Ghate SV; Walsh R; Litton TP; Devalapalli A; Kim C; Soo MS; Hyslop T; Hwang ES; Lo JY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Apr; 216(4):903-911. PubMed ID: 32783550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of magnetic resonance computer-aided diagnosis for preoperatively determining invasive disease in ultrasonography-guided core needle biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ.
Ahn HS; Kim SM; Kim MS; Jang M; Yun B; Kang E; Kim EK; Park SY; Kim B
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jul; 99(31):e21257. PubMed ID: 32756104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preoperative clinicopathologic factors and breast magnetic resonance imaging features can predict ductal carcinoma in situ with invasive components.
Lee CW; Wu HK; Lai HW; Wu WP; Chen ST; Chen DR; Chen CJ; Kuo SJ
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):780-9. PubMed ID: 26971424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can tumor-associated macrophages in ductal carcinoma in situ on biopsy predict invasive carcinoma on excision?
Hoskoppal D; Reisenbichler ES
Hum Pathol; 2018 Dec; 82():158-162. PubMed ID: 30067949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
