These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

539 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11268312)

  • 1. Marker assisted selection for the improvement of two antagonistic traits under mixed inheritance.
    Verrier E
    Genet Sel Evol; 2001; 33(1):17-38. PubMed ID: 11268312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marker assisted selection for genetic improvement of animal populations when a single QTL is marked.
    Ruane J; Colleau JJ
    Genet Res; 1995 Aug; 66(1):71-83. PubMed ID: 8575670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic evaluation with major genes and polygenic inheritance when some animals are not genotyped using gene content multiple-trait BLUP.
    Legarra A; Vitezica ZG
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Nov; 47():89. PubMed ID: 26576649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Benefits from marker-assisted selection under an additive polygenic genetic model.
    Villanueva B; Pong-Wong R; Fernández J; Toro MA
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Aug; 83(8):1747-52. PubMed ID: 16024693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two-stage selection strategies utilizing marker-quantitative trait locus information and individual performance.
    Gomez-Raya L; Klemetsdal G
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Aug; 77(8):2008-18. PubMed ID: 10461975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Within-family marker-assisted selection for aquaculture species.
    Sonesson AK
    Genet Sel Evol; 2007; 39(3):301-17. PubMed ID: 17433243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Linkage disequilibrium and selection response in two-stage marker-assisted selection of dairy cattle over several generations.
    Schulman NF; Dentine MR
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2005 Apr; 122(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 16130477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic response from marker assisted selection in an outbred population for differing marker bracket sizes and with two identified quantitative trait loci.
    Spelman R; Bovenhuis H
    Genetics; 1998 Mar; 148(3):1389-96. PubMed ID: 9539451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimal selection on two quantitative trait loci with linkage.
    Dekkers JC; Chakraborty R; Moreau L
    Genet Sel Evol; 2002; 34(2):171-92. PubMed ID: 12081806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marker-assisted selection reduces expected inbreeding but can result in large effects of hitchhiking.
    Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC; Berg P
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Jun; 127(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 20536636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of marker-assisted selection under different initial frequency of QTL favorable allele.
    Lu SX; Wu CX; Lian LS
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2003 Aug; 30(8):750-4. PubMed ID: 14682244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrix.
    Tiezzi F; Maltecca C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):24. PubMed ID: 25886167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Theoretical efficiency of multiple-trait quantitative trait loci-assisted selection.
    Togashi K; Lin CY
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Feb; 127(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 20074187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters.
    Muir WM
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):342-55. PubMed ID: 18076471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using markers with large effect in genetic and genomic predictions.
    Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; van Son M; Nordbø Ø; Grindflek EH; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 28177367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genomic selection for marker-assisted improvement in line crosses.
    Piyasatian N; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC
    Theor Appl Genet; 2007 Sep; 115(5):665-74. PubMed ID: 17673971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marker-assisted selection can reduce true as well as pedigree-estimated inbreeding.
    Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC; Berg P
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2214-23. PubMed ID: 19389980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A molecular selection index method based on eigenanalysis.
    Cerón-Rojas JJ; Castillo-González F; Sahagún-Castellanos J; Santacruz-Varela A; Benítez-Riquelme I; Crossa J
    Genetics; 2008 Sep; 180(1):547-57. PubMed ID: 18716338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of missing marker genotypes on the accuracy of gene-assisted breeding value estimation: a comparison of methods.
    Mulder HA; Meuwissen TH; Calus MP; Veerkamp RF
    Animal; 2010 Jan; 4(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 22443613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Across-family marker-assisted selection using selective genotyping strategies in dairy cattle breeding schemes.
    Ansari-Mahyari S; Sørensen AC; Lund MS; Thomsen H; Berg P
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Apr; 91(4):1628-39. PubMed ID: 18349255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.