These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Intermediate-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion may be a valid diagnostic/interpretive category. Ravinsky E; Baker P Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Feb; 37(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 19021235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Should LSIL-H be a distinct cytology category?: A study on the frequency and distribution of 40 human papillomavirus genotypes in 808 women. Zhou H; Schwartz MR; Coffey D; Smith D; Mody DR; Ge Y Cancer Cytopathol; 2012 Dec; 120(6):373-9. PubMed ID: 22648956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Colposcopy, cytology and histology in the diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. Carta G; Di Stefano L; Catellani Perelli A; Toro G; Moscarini M Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 1999; 26(2):60-6. PubMed ID: 10459438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Performance of HPV DNA testing with hybrid capture 2 in triaging women with minor cervical cytologic abnormalities (ASC-US/LSIL) in Northern Thailand. Khunamornpong S; Settakorn J; Sukpan K; Srisomboon J; Suprasert P; Siriaunkgul S Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(24):10961-6. PubMed ID: 25605209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Qualification of ASCUS. A comparison of equivocal LSIL and equivocal HSIL cervical cytology in the ASCUS LSIL Triage Study. Sherman ME; Solomon D; Schiffman M; Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Sep; 116(3):386-94. PubMed ID: 11554167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical significance of the diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Alsharif M; Kjeldahl K; Curran C; Miller S; Gulbahce HE; Pambuccian SE Cancer; 2009 Apr; 117(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 19365830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The significance of the Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Nasser SM; Cibas ES; Crum CP; Faquin WC Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 14579293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The clinical significance of "squamous intraepithelial lesion of indeterminate grade" as a distinct cytologic category. Wong D; Teschendorf C; Lin GY; Hasteh F Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 May; 137(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 22523214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. Arbyn M; Buntinx F; Van Ranst M; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch P; Dillner J J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(4):280-93. PubMed ID: 14970277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Identifying women with cervical neoplasia: using human papillomavirus DNA testing for equivocal Papanicolaou results. Manos MM; Kinney WK; Hurley LB; Sherman ME; Shieh-Ngai J; Kurman RJ; Ransley JE; Fetterman BJ; Hartinger JS; McIntosh KM; Pawlick GF; Hiatt RA JAMA; 1999 May; 281(17):1605-10. PubMed ID: 10235153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sensitivity of the Pap test in detecting high grade lesions: what should be the acceptable cytologic threshold for colposcopic referral? Sodhani P; Gupta S; Singh V; Sehgal A; Halder K; Parashari A Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 16610686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: Bethesda classification and association with Human Papillomavirus. Barcelos AC; Michelin MA; Adad SJ; Murta EF Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol; 2011; 2011():904674. PubMed ID: 21760701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Triage of women with ASCUS and LSIL on Pap smear reports: management by repeat Pap smear, HPV DNA testing, or colposcopy? Ferris DG; Wright TC; Litaker MS; Richart RM; Lorincz AT; Sun XW; Borgatta L; Buck H; Kramer L; Rubin R J Fam Pract; 1998 Feb; 46(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 9487318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Role of Pap Test terminology and age in the detection of carcinoma invasive and carcinoma in situ in medically underserved California women. Howell LP; Tabnak F; Tudury AJ; Stoodt G Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Apr; 30(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 15048955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Systematic evaluation of the new screen methods of cervical intraepithelial neoplasm]. Jin L; Wang Y; Lang J; Li C; Cheng X; Feng H Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Mar; 37(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 11953085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of human papillomavirus DNA prevalence in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance subcategories as defined by the original Bethesda 1991 and the new Bethesda 2001 Systems. Pirog EC; Erroll M; Harigopal M; Centeno BA Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2004 May; 128(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 15086283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Combined p16INK4a and human papillomavirus testing improves the prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN II-III) in Thai patients with low-grade cytological abnormalities. Ekalaksananan T; Pientong C; Kongyingyoes B; Chaiwongkot A; Yuenyao P; Kleebkaow P; Kritpetcharat O; Evans MF Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(7):1777-83. PubMed ID: 22126564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Colposcopic and histologic findings in women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Yarandi F; Izadi Mood N; Mirashrafi F; Eftekhar Z Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 15598287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Managing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in Papanicolaou smears. Morin C; Bairati I; Bouchard C; Fortier M; Roy M; Moore L; Meisels A J Reprod Med; 2001 Sep; 46(9):799-805. PubMed ID: 11584480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]