278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11268564)
21. "Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion" is a distinct cytologic category: histologic outcomes and HPV prevalence.
Owens CL; Moats DR; Burroughs FH; Gustafson KS
Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Sep; 128(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 17709313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Intermediate-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion may be a valid diagnostic/interpretive category.
Ravinsky E; Baker P
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Feb; 37(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 19021235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Should LSIL-H be a distinct cytology category?: A study on the frequency and distribution of 40 human papillomavirus genotypes in 808 women.
Zhou H; Schwartz MR; Coffey D; Smith D; Mody DR; Ge Y
Cancer Cytopathol; 2012 Dec; 120(6):373-9. PubMed ID: 22648956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Colposcopy, cytology and histology in the diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix.
Carta G; Di Stefano L; Catellani Perelli A; Toro G; Moscarini M
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 1999; 26(2):60-6. PubMed ID: 10459438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Performance of HPV DNA testing with hybrid capture 2 in triaging women with minor cervical cytologic abnormalities (ASC-US/LSIL) in Northern Thailand.
Khunamornpong S; Settakorn J; Sukpan K; Srisomboon J; Suprasert P; Siriaunkgul S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(24):10961-6. PubMed ID: 25605209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Qualification of ASCUS. A comparison of equivocal LSIL and equivocal HSIL cervical cytology in the ASCUS LSIL Triage Study.
Sherman ME; Solomon D; Schiffman M;
Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Sep; 116(3):386-94. PubMed ID: 11554167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical significance of the diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Alsharif M; Kjeldahl K; Curran C; Miller S; Gulbahce HE; Pambuccian SE
Cancer; 2009 Apr; 117(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 19365830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The significance of the Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Nasser SM; Cibas ES; Crum CP; Faquin WC
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 14579293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The clinical significance of "squamous intraepithelial lesion of indeterminate grade" as a distinct cytologic category.
Wong D; Teschendorf C; Lin GY; Hasteh F
Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 May; 137(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 22523214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.
Arbyn M; Buntinx F; Van Ranst M; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch P; Dillner J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(4):280-93. PubMed ID: 14970277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Identifying women with cervical neoplasia: using human papillomavirus DNA testing for equivocal Papanicolaou results.
Manos MM; Kinney WK; Hurley LB; Sherman ME; Shieh-Ngai J; Kurman RJ; Ransley JE; Fetterman BJ; Hartinger JS; McIntosh KM; Pawlick GF; Hiatt RA
JAMA; 1999 May; 281(17):1605-10. PubMed ID: 10235153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sensitivity of the Pap test in detecting high grade lesions: what should be the acceptable cytologic threshold for colposcopic referral?
Sodhani P; Gupta S; Singh V; Sehgal A; Halder K; Parashari A
Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 16610686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: Bethesda classification and association with Human Papillomavirus.
Barcelos AC; Michelin MA; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol; 2011; 2011():904674. PubMed ID: 21760701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Triage of women with ASCUS and LSIL on Pap smear reports: management by repeat Pap smear, HPV DNA testing, or colposcopy?
Ferris DG; Wright TC; Litaker MS; Richart RM; Lorincz AT; Sun XW; Borgatta L; Buck H; Kramer L; Rubin R
J Fam Pract; 1998 Feb; 46(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 9487318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Role of Pap Test terminology and age in the detection of carcinoma invasive and carcinoma in situ in medically underserved California women.
Howell LP; Tabnak F; Tudury AJ; Stoodt G
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Apr; 30(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 15048955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Systematic evaluation of the new screen methods of cervical intraepithelial neoplasm].
Jin L; Wang Y; Lang J; Li C; Cheng X; Feng H
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Mar; 37(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 11953085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of human papillomavirus DNA prevalence in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance subcategories as defined by the original Bethesda 1991 and the new Bethesda 2001 Systems.
Pirog EC; Erroll M; Harigopal M; Centeno BA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2004 May; 128(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 15086283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Combined p16INK4a and human papillomavirus testing improves the prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN II-III) in Thai patients with low-grade cytological abnormalities.
Ekalaksananan T; Pientong C; Kongyingyoes B; Chaiwongkot A; Yuenyao P; Kleebkaow P; Kritpetcharat O; Evans MF
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(7):1777-83. PubMed ID: 22126564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Colposcopic and histologic findings in women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Yarandi F; Izadi Mood N; Mirashrafi F; Eftekhar Z
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 15598287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Managing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in Papanicolaou smears.
Morin C; Bairati I; Bouchard C; Fortier M; Roy M; Moore L; Meisels A
J Reprod Med; 2001 Sep; 46(9):799-805. PubMed ID: 11584480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
