These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11268985)
1. Comparison of the UICC/AJCC 1992 and 1997 pN categories for gastric cancer patients after surgery. Wu CW; Hsieh MC; Lo SS; Shen KH; Lui WY; P'eng FK Hepatogastroenterology; 2001; 48(37):279-84. PubMed ID: 11268985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Classification of regional lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma. German Gastric Cancer Study Group. Roder JD; Böttcher K; Busch R; Wittekind C; Hermanek P; Siewert JR Cancer; 1998 Feb; 82(4):621-31. PubMed ID: 9477092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic impact of positive lymph node ratio in gastric carcinoma. Celen O; Yildirim E; Berberoglu U J Surg Oncol; 2007 Aug; 96(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 17443727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative effect of lymph node metastasis classified by the anatomical site or by the number of nodes involved on prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. Hidaka H; Eto T; Maehara N; Jimi S; Hotokezaka M; Chijiiwa K Hepatogastroenterology; 2008; 55(88):2269-72. PubMed ID: 19260520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Problems in the N-classification of the new 1997 UICC TNM stage classification for gastric cancer: an analysis of over 10 years' outcome of Japanese patients. Nio Y; Yamasawa K; Yamaguchi K; Itakura M; Omori H; Koike M; Kitamura Y; Tsuji M; Endo S; Ogo Y; Yano S; Sumi S Anticancer Res; 2003; 23(1B):697-705. PubMed ID: 12680170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer: comparison of Union International Contra Cancer and Japanese systems. Ikeguchi M; Murakami D; Kanaji S; Ohro S; Maeta Y; Yamaguchi K; Tatebe S; Kondo A; Tsujitani S; Kaibara N ANZ J Surg; 2004 Oct; 74(10):852-4. PubMed ID: 15456431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Classification of lymph node metastases from gastric cancer: comparison between N-site and N-number systems. Our experience and review of the literature. Aurello P; D'Angelo F; Rossi S; Bellagamba R; Cicchini C; Nigri G; Ercolani G; De Angelis R; Ramacciato G Am Surg; 2007 Apr; 73(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 17439029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lymph node metastases in gastric cancer: correlation between new and old UICC TNM classification. Omejc M; Juvan R; Jelenc F; Repse S Int Surg; 2001; 86(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 11890334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the prognostic significance between the number of metastatic lymph nodes and nodal stage in gastric carcinoma. Kato M; Saji S; Kawaguchi Y; Kunieda K; Sugiyama Y; Takagi Y; Hiraoka T; Kumazawa I; Adachi T Hepatogastroenterology; 1999; 46(30):3281-6. PubMed ID: 10626202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the New International Union Against Cancer TNM staging for gastric carcinoma. Katai H; Yoshimura K; Maruyama K; Sasako M; Sano T Cancer; 2000 Apr; 88(8):1796-800. PubMed ID: 10760754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Log odds of positive lymph nodes: a novel prognostic indicator superior to the number-based and the ratio-based N category for gastric cancer patients with R0 resection. Sun Z; Xu Y; Li de M; Wang ZN; Zhu GL; Huang BJ; Li K; Xu HM Cancer; 2010 Jun; 116(11):2571-80. PubMed ID: 20336791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of survival in gastric carcinoma related to lymph node grading by the new American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union International Contre le Cancer System or the Japanese system. Celen O; Yildirim E; Gülben K; Berberoğlu U Eur J Surg Suppl; 2003 Jul; (588):33-9. PubMed ID: 15200041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The study of the minimum number of examined lymph nodes for the TNM classification of gastric cancer]. Chen B; Sun JY; Jin F; Xu HM; Wang SB Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Jun; 43(11):702-5. PubMed ID: 16008956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Suitability of 7th UICC N stage for predicting the overall survival of gastric cancer patients after curative resection in China. Deng J; Liang H; Sun D; Wang D; Pan Y Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 May; 17(5):1259-66. PubMed ID: 20217252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinicopathological characteristics and outcome indicators of stage II gastric cancer according to the Japanese classification of gastric cancer. Ojima H; Araki K; Kato T; Okamura K; Manda R; Hirayama I; Hosouchi Y; Nishida Y; Kuwano H Anticancer Res; 2006; 26(2B):1385-90. PubMed ID: 16619548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Metastatic lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer. Asoglu O; Karanlik H; Parlak M; Kecer M; Muslumanoglu M; Igci A; Ozmen V; Gulluoglu M; Kapran Y Hepatogastroenterology; 2009; 56(91-92):908-13. PubMed ID: 19621727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic significance of lymph node station 7 for patients with gastric cancers underwent radical surgery. Tong JH; Sun Z; Zhu Z; Wang ZN; Xu YY; Huang BJ; Xu Y; Xu HM J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 105(8):805-12. PubMed ID: 22212911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reappraisal of the new UICC staging system for gastric cancer: problem in lymph node stage. Lee WJ; Hong RL; Lai IR; Chen CN; Lee PH; Chung KC Hepatogastroenterology; 2002; 49(45):860-4. PubMed ID: 12064008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gastric cancer: correlation between clinicopathological factors and survival of patients (III). Lazăr D; Tăban S; Sporea I; Dema A; Cornianu M; Lazăr E; Goldiş A; Vernic C Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2009; 50(3):369-79. PubMed ID: 19690762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Splenic hilar lymph node metastasis independently predicts poor survival for patients with gastric cancers in the upper and/or the middle third of the stomach. Zhu GL; Sun Z; Wang ZN; Xu YY; Huang BJ; Xu Y; Zhu Z; Xu HM J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 105(8):786-92. PubMed ID: 22105768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]