These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11269979)
1. Initial experience with an autocapture pacemaker system. Kam RM; Tan CS; Teo WS Ann Acad Med Singap; 2000 Nov; 29(6):732-4. PubMed ID: 11269979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term follow-up of pacemakers with an Autocapture pacing system. Erdinler I; Akyol A; Okmen E; Oguz E; Gurkan K; Ulufer T Jpn Heart J; 2002 Nov; 43(6):631-41. PubMed ID: 12558127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Compatibility of automatic threshold tracking pacemakers with previously implanted pacing leads in children. Kucukosmanoglu O; Celiker A; Ozer S; Karagoz T Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2002 Nov; 25(11):1624-7. PubMed ID: 12494622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adjustment of the evoked response sensitivity after hospital discharge in pacemaker patients with automatic ventricular threshold tracking activated. Schuchert A; Ventura R; Meinertz T; Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Feb; 24(2):212-6. PubMed ID: 11270702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Autocapture compatibility in patients with the MembraneEX lead and Affinity pulse generators. Schuchert A; Voitk J; Liu B; Kolk R; Stammwitz E; Beiras J; Europace; 2001 Oct; 3(4):332-5. PubMed ID: 11678393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pacing with capture verification in candidates for resynchronisation therapy: a feasibility study. Biffi M; Boriani G; Bertini M; Silvestri P; Martignani C; Branzi A Europace; 2005 May; 7(3):255-65. PubMed ID: 15878565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low-energy epicardial pacing in children: the benefit of autocapture. Bauersfeld U; Nowak B; Molinari L; Malm T; Kampmann C; Schönbeck MH; Schüller H Ann Thorac Surg; 1999 Oct; 68(4):1380-3. PubMed ID: 10543510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term results of endocardial pacing with Autocapture threshold tracking pacemakers in children. Celiker A; Ceviz N; Küçükosmanoğlu O Europace; 2005 Nov; 7(6):569-75. PubMed ID: 16216759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrical performance and automatic capture characteristics of a 3.5-mm(2) passive fixation lead during 1-year follow-up. Lotze U; Fischer S; Höfs T; Liebetrau J; Fettin W; Scheiner J; Lang A; Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Aug; 32(8):1050-5. PubMed ID: 19659625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of ventricular Autocapture function in increasing longevity of DDDR pacemakers: a prospective study. Boriani G; Rusconi L; Biffi M; Pavia L; Sassara M; Malfitano D; Bongiorni MG; Padeletti L; Filice I; Sanfelici D; Maffei P; Vicentini A; Branzi A Europace; 2006 Mar; 8(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 16627443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Threshold tracking pacing based on beat by beat evoked response detection: clinical benefits and potential problems. Duru F; Bauersfeld U; Schüller H; Candinas R J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2000 Oct; 4(3):511-22. PubMed ID: 11046190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A cardiac evoked response algorithm providing threshold tracking: a North American multicenter study. Clinical Investigators of the Microny-Regency Clinical Evaluation Study. Lau C; Cameron DA; Nishimura SC; Ahern T; Freedman RA; Ellenbogen K; Greenberg S; Baker J; Meacham D Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Jun; 23(6):953-9. PubMed ID: 10879378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automatic adjustment of pacemaker stimulation output correlated with continuously monitored capture thresholds: a multicenter study. European Microny Study Group. Clarke M; Liu B; Schüller H; Binner L; Kennergren C; Guerola M; Weinmann P; Ohm OJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Aug; 21(8):1567-75. PubMed ID: 9725155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benefits in projected pacemaker longevity and in pacing related costs conferred by automatic threshold tracking. Boriani G; Biffi M; Branzi A; Mininno A; Sigliano R; Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Nov; 23(11 Pt 2):1783-7. PubMed ID: 11139923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automatic threshold tracking activation without the intraoperative evaluation of the evoked response amplitude. AUTOCAP Investigators. Schuchert A; Ventura R; Meinertz T Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Mar; 23(3):321-4. PubMed ID: 10750131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Autocapture(TM) and Capture Management(TM) Current concepts in pacing threshold and output management]. Anelli-Monti M; Mächler H; Oberwalder P; Dacar D; Knez I; Salaymeh L; Streinu C; Rigler B Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol; 2001 Dec; 12(4):186-94. PubMed ID: 27432388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Limitations of the AutoCapture™ Pacing System in patients with cardiac stimulation devices. Benezet-Mazuecos J; Iglesias JA; Rubio JM; Cortés M; de la Cruz E; de la Vieja JJ; Calle S; Farré J Europace; 2014 Oct; 16(10):1469-75. PubMed ID: 24789975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved differentiation of the ventricular evoked response from polarization by modification of the pacemaker impulse. Provenier F; Germonpré E; De Wagter X Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Dec; 23(12):2073-7. PubMed ID: 11202250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acute effects of a class IA antiarrhythmic drug on the ventricular evoked response amplitude in patients with cardiac pacemakers. Schuchert A; Meinertz T Cardiology; 2000; 94(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 11173781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A cardiac evoked response algorithm providing automatic threshold tracking for continuous capture verification: a single-center prospective study. Verma PK; Sharma JK; Khan IA; Bali HK; Varma JS; Bhargava M; Sharma YP; Grover A Indian Heart J; 2001; 53(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 11759937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]