These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Bootstrap estimation of diagnostic accuracy with patient-clustered data. Rutter CM Acad Radiol; 2000 Jun; 7(6):413-9. PubMed ID: 10845400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Confidence intervals for measures of interaction. Assmann SF; Hosmer DW; Lemeshow S; Mundt KA Epidemiology; 1996 May; 7(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 8728443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing Simultaneous and Pointwise Confidence Intervals for Hydrological Processes. Francisco-Fernández M; Quintela-del-Río A PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0147505. PubMed ID: 26828651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring inter-rater reliability for nominal data - which coefficients and confidence intervals are appropriate? Zapf A; Castell S; Morawietz L; Karch A BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Aug; 16():93. PubMed ID: 27495131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A GEE approach to estimating sensitivity and specificity and coverage properties of the confidence intervals. Sternberg MR; Hadgu A Stat Med; 2001 May 15-30; 20(9-10):1529-39. PubMed ID: 11343372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Constructing bootstrap confidence intervals for principal component loadings in the presence of missing data: a multiple-imputation approach. van Ginkel JR; Kiers HA Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):498-515. PubMed ID: 21973098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combining Nordtest method and bootstrap resampling for measurement uncertainty estimation of hematology analytes in a medical laboratory. Cui M; Xu L; Wang H; Ju S; Xu S; Jing R Clin Biochem; 2017 Dec; 50(18):1067-1072. PubMed ID: 28928006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of confidence intervals for adjusted attributable risk estimates under multinomial sampling. Lehnert-Batar A; Pfahlberg A; Gefeller O Biom J; 2006 Aug; 48(5):805-19. PubMed ID: 17094345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A more flexible parametric estimation of univariate reference intervals: a new method based on the GS-distribution. Trujillano J; Muiño JM; March J; Sorribas A Clin Chim Acta; 2007 Apr; 379(1-2):71-80. PubMed ID: 17276425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of bootstrap approaches for estimating uncertainty of parameters in linear mixed-effects models. Thai HT; Mentré F; Holford NH; Veyrat-Follet C; Comets E Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(3):129-40. PubMed ID: 23457061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of the bootstrap in analysing cost data from cluster randomised trials: some simulation results. Flynn TN; Peters TJ BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Nov; 4(1):33. PubMed ID: 15550169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using the bootstrap to improve estimation and confidence intervals for regression coefficients selected using backwards variable elimination. Austin PC Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(17):3286-300. PubMed ID: 17940997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving coverage probabilities for parametric tolerance intervals via bootstrap calibration. Zou Y; Young DS Stat Med; 2020 Jul; 39(16):2152-2166. PubMed ID: 32249974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An approach to establish the uncertainty budget of catalytic activity concentration measurements in a reference laboratory. Rami L; Canalias F Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 Apr; 53(5):743-51. PubMed ID: 25283140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]