These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11270513)

  • 1. Differences in locomotor response to an inescapable novel environment predict sensitivity to aversive effects of amphetamine.
    Kunin D; Gaskin S; Borjas MB; Smith BR; Amit Z
    Behav Pharmacol; 2001 Feb; 12(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 11270513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual differences in behavioral responses to novelty and amphetamine self-administration in male and female rats.
    Klebaur JE; Bevins RA; Segar TM; Bardo MT
    Behav Pharmacol; 2001 Jul; 12(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 11548112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Re-examination of amphetamine-induced conditioned suppression of tastant intake in rats: the task-dependent drug effects hypothesis.
    Huang AC; Hsiao S
    Behav Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 122(6):1207-16. PubMed ID: 19045940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dopamine transporter, but not tyrosine hydroxylase, may be implicated in determining individual differences in behavioral sensitization to amphetamine.
    Dietz DM; Tapocik J; Gaval-Cruz M; Kabbaj M
    Physiol Behav; 2005 Oct; 86(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 16126238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of heavy particle irradiation and diet on amphetamine- and lithium chloride-induced taste avoidance learning in rats.
    Rabin BM; Shukitt-Hale B; Szprengiel A; Joseph JA
    Brain Res; 2002 Oct; 953(1-2):31-6. PubMed ID: 12384235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Corticosterone fails to produce conditioned place preference or conditioned place aversion in rats.
    Dietz D; Wang H; Kabbaj M
    Behav Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 181(2):287-91. PubMed ID: 17521748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual responses to novelty predict qualitative differences in d-amphetamine-induced open field but not reward-related behaviors in rats.
    Antoniou K; Papathanasiou G; Panagis G; Nomikos GG; Hyphantis T; Papadopoulou-Daifoti Z
    Neuroscience; 2004; 123(3):613-23. PubMed ID: 14706774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rewarding drugs produce taste avoidance, but not taste aversion.
    Parker LA
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 1995; 19(1):143-57. PubMed ID: 7770194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The contribution of the central nucleus of the amygdala to individual differences in amphetamine-induced hyperactivity.
    Cain ME; Coolon RA; Gill MJ
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 202(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 19447275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual differences in locomotor reactivity to a novel environment and sensitivity to opioid drugs in the rat. I. Expression of morphine-induced locomotor sensitization.
    Kalinichev M; White DA; Holtzman SG
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2004 Dec; 177(1-2):61-7. PubMed ID: 15316716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rewarding and locomotor-activating effects of direct dopamine receptor agonists are augmented by chronic food restriction in rats.
    Carr KD; Kim GY; Cabeza de Vaca S
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2001 Apr; 154(4):420-8. PubMed ID: 11349397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual differences in response to novelty, amphetamine-induced activity and drug discrimination in rats.
    Bevins RA; Klebaur JE; Bardo MT
    Behav Pharmacol; 1997 Jun; 8(2-3):113-23. PubMed ID: 9833007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predisposition to self-administer amphetamine: the contribution of response to novelty and prior exposure to the drug.
    Pierre PJ; Vezina P
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1997 Feb; 129(3):277-84. PubMed ID: 9084067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ontogenetic differences in sensitivity to LiCl- and amphetamine-induced taste avoidance in preweanling rats.
    Revillo DA; Spear NE; Arias C
    Chem Senses; 2011 Jul; 36(6):565-77. PubMed ID: 21444932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modulation of the locomotor properties of morphine and amphetamine by uncontrollable stress.
    Will MJ; Der-Avakian A; Pepin JL; Durkan BT; Watkins LR; Maier SF
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2002; 71(1-2):345-51. PubMed ID: 11812543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociation of novelty- and cocaine-conditioned locomotor activity from cocaine place conditioning.
    Kosten TA; Miserendino MJ
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1998 Aug; 60(4):785-91. PubMed ID: 9700959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethanol-mediated aversive learning as a function of locomotor activity in a novel environment in infant Sprague-Dawley rats.
    Arias C; Molina JC; Spear NE
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2009 Jun; 92(4):621-8. PubMed ID: 19281838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strain differences in response to escapable and inescapable novel environments and their ability to predict amphetamine-induced locomotor activity.
    Miserendino MJ; Haile CN; Kosten TA
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2003 May; 167(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 12664191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of novelty on amphetamine self-administration in rats classified as high and low responders.
    Cain ME; Smith CM; Bardo MT
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2004 Nov; 176(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 15502935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual differences in behavior following amphetamine, GBR-12909, or apomorphine but not SKF-38393 or quinpirole.
    Hooks MS; Jones DN; Holtzman SG; Juncos JL; Kalivas PW; Justice JB
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1994 Oct; 116(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 7862951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.