152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11270702)
1. Adjustment of the evoked response sensitivity after hospital discharge in pacemaker patients with automatic ventricular threshold tracking activated.
Schuchert A; Ventura R; Meinertz T;
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Feb; 24(2):212-6. PubMed ID: 11270702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automatic threshold tracking activation without the intraoperative evaluation of the evoked response amplitude. AUTOCAP Investigators.
Schuchert A; Ventura R; Meinertz T
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Mar; 23(3):321-4. PubMed ID: 10750131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term follow-up of pacemakers with an Autocapture pacing system.
Erdinler I; Akyol A; Okmen E; Oguz E; Gurkan K; Ulufer T
Jpn Heart J; 2002 Nov; 43(6):631-41. PubMed ID: 12558127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Autocapture compatibility in patients with the MembraneEX lead and Affinity pulse generators.
Schuchert A; Voitk J; Liu B; Kolk R; Stammwitz E; Beiras J;
Europace; 2001 Oct; 3(4):332-5. PubMed ID: 11678393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acute effects of a class IA antiarrhythmic drug on the ventricular evoked response amplitude in patients with cardiac pacemakers.
Schuchert A; Meinertz T
Cardiology; 2000; 94(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 11173781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Compatibility of automatic threshold tracking pacemakers with previously implanted pacing leads in children.
Kucukosmanoglu O; Celiker A; Ozer S; Karagoz T
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2002 Nov; 25(11):1624-7. PubMed ID: 12494622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrical performance and automatic capture characteristics of a 3.5-mm(2) passive fixation lead during 1-year follow-up.
Lotze U; Fischer S; Höfs T; Liebetrau J; Fettin W; Scheiner J; Lang A;
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Aug; 32(8):1050-5. PubMed ID: 19659625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A cardiac evoked response algorithm providing threshold tracking: a North American multicenter study. Clinical Investigators of the Microny-Regency Clinical Evaluation Study.
Lau C; Cameron DA; Nishimura SC; Ahern T; Freedman RA; Ellenbogen K; Greenberg S; Baker J; Meacham D
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Jun; 23(6):953-9. PubMed ID: 10879378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term results of endocardial pacing with Autocapture threshold tracking pacemakers in children.
Celiker A; Ceviz N; Küçükosmanoğlu O
Europace; 2005 Nov; 7(6):569-75. PubMed ID: 16216759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A cardiac evoked response algorithm providing automatic threshold tracking for continuous capture verification: a single-center prospective study.
Verma PK; Sharma JK; Khan IA; Bali HK; Varma JS; Bhargava M; Sharma YP; Grover A
Indian Heart J; 2001; 53(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 11759937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Initial experience with an autocapture pacemaker system.
Kam RM; Tan CS; Teo WS
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2000 Nov; 29(6):732-4. PubMed ID: 11269979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized study on the effects of pacemaker programming to a lower output on projected pulse generator longevity.
Schuchert A; Meinertz T;
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Aug; 24(8 Pt 1):1234-9. PubMed ID: 11523609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of body position and exercise on evoked response signal for automatic threshold activation.
Schuchert A; Ventura R; Meinertz T
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Oct; 22(10):1476-80. PubMed ID: 10588149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved differentiation of the ventricular evoked response from polarization by modification of the pacemaker impulse.
Provenier F; Germonpré E; De Wagter X
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Dec; 23(12):2073-7. PubMed ID: 11202250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of ventricular Autocapture function in increasing longevity of DDDR pacemakers: a prospective study.
Boriani G; Rusconi L; Biffi M; Pavia L; Sassara M; Malfitano D; Bongiorni MG; Padeletti L; Filice I; Sanfelici D; Maffei P; Vicentini A; Branzi A
Europace; 2006 Mar; 8(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 16627443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pacing with capture verification in candidates for resynchronisation therapy: a feasibility study.
Biffi M; Boriani G; Bertini M; Silvestri P; Martignani C; Branzi A
Europace; 2005 May; 7(3):255-65. PubMed ID: 15878565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Benefits in projected pacemaker longevity and in pacing related costs conferred by automatic threshold tracking.
Boriani G; Biffi M; Branzi A; Mininno A; Sigliano R;
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Nov; 23(11 Pt 2):1783-7. PubMed ID: 11139923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Autocapture enhancements: unipolar and bipolar lead compatibility and bipolar pacing capability on bipolar leads.
Binner L; Messenger J; Sperzel J; Bondke H; Vandekerckhove Y; Poore J; Scheiner J; Berkhof M; Park E; Holmström N; Bornzin GA
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Jan; 26(1P2):221-4. PubMed ID: 12687816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Present day pacemakers for pulse generator exchange: is 3.5 V a sufficient nominal setting for the pulse amplitude? Thera Pacemaker Study Group.
Schuchert A; Van Langen H; Michels K; Meinertz T
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1824-7. PubMed ID: 8945049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of automatic threshold tracking on pulse generator longevity in patients with different chronic stimulation thresholds.
Simeon L; Duru F; Fluri M; Jenzer HR; Rahn M; Candinas R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Nov; 23(11 Pt 2):1788-91. PubMed ID: 11139924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
