217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11270959)
1. [Follow-up patients with sick sinus syndrome after pacemaker implantation].
Iskenderov BG; Latyshev DS
Ter Arkh; 2000; 72(11):54-6. PubMed ID: 11270959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Dynamic electrophysiological examination of heart in patients with sick sinus syndrome in continuous pacing].
Iskenderov BG; Tatarchenko IP
Ter Arkh; 1998; 70(4):24-7. PubMed ID: 9612897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Pacemaker therapy for the sick sinus node syndrome. Does the atrially involved pacemaker system lower the frequency of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic complications as well as mortality?].
Hofgärtner F; Maier B; Eisele R; Hauber J; Sigel H
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1994 Dec; 119(49):1683-9. PubMed ID: 7988373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Sick sinus syndrome. Pacemaker with atrial versus ventricular stimulation].
Andersen HR; Thuesen L; Bagger JP; Vesterlund T; Thomsen PE
Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Feb; 158(8):1062-7. PubMed ID: 8638338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Single-chamber atrial pacing is better than single chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome. Results of long-term follow up in a prospective randomized study].
Nielsen JC; Mortensen PT; Thuesen L; Nielsen TV; Thomsen PE; Pedersen AK; Andersen HR
Ugeskr Laeger; 1999 Feb; 161(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 9989193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sinus and paced P wave duration and dispersion as predictors of atrial fibrillation after pacemaker implantation in patients with isolated sick sinus syndrome.
Kristensen L; Nielsen JC; Mortensen PT; Christensen PD; Vesterlund T; Pedersen AK; Andersen HR
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 May; 27(5):606-14. PubMed ID: 15125716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Risk of the first degree atrioventricular block during atrial pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome].
Szczechowicz M; Wilczek U; Lelakowski J
Przegl Lek; 2010; 67(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 20687375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New onset of pacemaker dependency after permanent pacemaker implantation.
Nagatomo T; Abe H; Kikuchi K; Nakashima Y
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Apr; 27(4):475-9. PubMed ID: 15078400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Implantation of atrial pacemaker in patients with sinoatrial failure].
Gundersen T
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1998 Oct; 118(24):3758-60. PubMed ID: 9816943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Natural history of sick sinus syndrome following permanent pacemaker implantation.
Amikam S; Riss E
Isr J Med Sci; 1979 Nov; 15(11):889-93. PubMed ID: 528172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term clinical performance of AAI pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: a comparison with dual-chamber pacing.
Masumoto H; Ueda Y; Kato R; Usui A; Maseki T; Takagi Y; Usui M
Europace; 2004 Sep; 6(5):444-50. PubMed ID: 15294270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Programming a fixed long atrioventricular delay is not effective in preventing ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
Nielsen JC; Pedersen AK; Mortensen PT; Andersen HR
Europace; 1999 Apr; 1(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 11228853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Survival in patients with sick sinus syndrome and artificial pacemaker. Determining clinical factors].
Sanjuán R; Morell S; Ruiz R; Ibáñez M; Cortina J; Vicente Monmeneu J; Valls A; Blasco M; García Civera R; Botella S
Rev Esp Cardiol; 1996 Mar; 49(3):184-8. PubMed ID: 8685521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Atrial fibrillation and quality of life after pacemaker implantation for sick sinus syndrome: data from the Mode Selection Trial (MOST).
Fleischmann KE; Orav EJ; Lamas GA; Mangione CM; Schron EB; Lee KL; Goldman L;
Am Heart J; 2009 Jul; 158(1):78-83.e2. PubMed ID: 19540395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Clinical significance of corrected sinus node recovery time and natural and unnatural history of sinus node dysfunctions. A four-year prospective follow-up of 101 cases].
Raviele A; Di Pede F; Zuin G; Callegari E; Delise P; Pascotto P; D'Este D; Dainese F; Piccolo E
G Ital Cardiol; 1982; 12(8):563-74. PubMed ID: 7169155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The mode selection trial (MOST) in sinus node dysfunction: design, rationale, and baseline characteristics of the first 1000 patients.
Lamas GA; Lee K; Sweeney M; Leon A; Yee R; Ellenbogen K; Greer S; Wilber D; Silverman R; Marinchak R; Bernstein R; Mittleman RS; Lieberman EH; Sullivan C; Zorn L; Flaker G; Schron E; Orav EJ; Goldman L
Am Heart J; 2000 Oct; 140(4):541-51. PubMed ID: 11011325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison between clinical and electrophysiological data before and after definitive pacemaker implantation for the sick sinus syndrome].
Di Iorio C; Di Renzo E; Caputo M; Rossi A; Francomano F; Ucchino S
Minerva Med; 1982 Apr; 73(14):841-4. PubMed ID: 7070695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Our experience using continuous atrial stimulation in sick sinus syndrome].
Swiatecka G; Stanke A; Kubica J; Lubiński A; Raczek G; Orzelski J; Głowacki J; Fiutowski T; Wilczek R
Kardiol Pol; 1989; 32(6):305-10. PubMed ID: 2632909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Abnormal right atrial electrograms predict the transition to chronic atrial fibrillation in paced patients with sick sinus syndrome.
Miyamoto K; Nakao K; Seto S; Shibata R; Doi Y; Fukae S; Matsuo K; Komiya N; Yano K
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 May; 27(5):644-50. PubMed ID: 15125722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pacemaker utilization during permanent atrial fibrillation in patients who received pacemaker implantation for sinus node dysfunction.
Li H; Lakkireddy D; Korlakunta H; Rovang K; Hee T
Am J Cardiol; 2005 Oct; 96(7):942-5. PubMed ID: 16188521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
