These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11271737)

  • 1. Fetal biometry: a comparison of family physicians and radiologists.
    Keith R; Frisch L
    Fam Med; 2001 Feb; 33(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 11271737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of prenatal sonography performed by family practice residents.
    Brunader R
    Fam Med; 1996 Jun; 28(6):407-10. PubMed ID: 8791068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Teaching prenatal ultrasound to family medicine residents.
    Dresang LT; Rodney WM; Dees J
    Fam Med; 2004 Feb; 36(2):98-107. PubMed ID: 14872356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing bimanual pelvic examination to ultrasound measurement for assessment of gestational age in the first trimester of pregnancy.
    Nichols M; Morgan E; Jensen JT
    J Reprod Med; 2002 Oct; 47(10):825-8. PubMed ID: 12418065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The interpretation of office radiographs by family physicians.
    Halvorsen JG; Kunian A; Gjerdingen D; Connolly J; Koopmeiners M; Cesnik J; Christenson C; Sanderson O
    J Fam Pract; 1989 Apr; 28(4):426-32. PubMed ID: 2703813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fetal ultrasound training for obstetrics and gynecology residents.
    Lee W; Hodges AN; Williams S; Vettraino IM; McNie B
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Feb; 103(2):333-8. PubMed ID: 14754704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Obstetric ultrasound training for family physicians. Results from a multi-site study.
    Hahn RG; Roi LD; Ornstein SM; Rodney WM; Garr DR; Davies TC; Morgan W; O'Brien JM; McLeary RD; Peggs JF
    J Fam Pract; 1988 May; 26(5):553-8. PubMed ID: 3284963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The current state of esophagogastroduodenoscopy training in family practice residency programs.
    Wilkins T; Hardy H
    Fam Med; 2003 Apr; 35(4):269-72. PubMed ID: 12729312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cesarean delivery results in a family medicine residency using a specific training model.
    Heider A; Neely B; Bell L
    Fam Med; 2006 Feb; 38(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 16450231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A national survey of research requirements for family practice residents and faculty.
    Neale AV
    Fam Med; 2002 Apr; 34(4):262-7. PubMed ID: 12017140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The reading habits of family practice residents.
    Johnson KH; Dayrit M; Bazargan M
    Fam Med; 1997; 29(7):488-91. PubMed ID: 9232410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using ultrasonic fetal size measurements to estimate gestational age in Brisbane, Australia.
    Schluter PJ; Pritchard G; Gill MA
    Australas Radiol; 2007 Feb; 51(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 17217489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiologic interpretation by family physicians in an office practice setting.
    Bergus GR; Franken EA; Koch TJ; Smith WL; Evans ER; Berbaum KS
    J Fam Pract; 1995 Oct; 41(4):352-6. PubMed ID: 7561708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of prediction of canine litter size and gestational age with ultrasound.
    Lenard ZM; Hopper BJ; Lester NV; Richardson JL; Robertson ID
    Aust Vet J; 2007 Jun; 85(6):222-5. PubMed ID: 17547634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electronic medical records: the family practice resident perspective.
    Aaronson JW; Murphy-Cullen CL; Chop WM; Frey RD
    Fam Med; 2001 Feb; 33(2):128-32. PubMed ID: 11271741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of choice of reference charts and equations on the assessment of fetal biometry.
    Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Duyme M; Buvat I; Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 25(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 15909324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasonic fetal size measurements in Brisbane, Australia.
    Schluter PJ; Pritchard G; Gill MA
    Australas Radiol; 2004 Dec; 48(4):480-6. PubMed ID: 15601328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of LMP-based and ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age using linked California livebirth and prenatal screening records.
    Dietz PM; England LJ; Callaghan WM; Pearl M; Wier ML; Kharrazi M
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():62-71. PubMed ID: 17803619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Family practice obstetric ultrasound in an urban community health center. Birth outcomes and examination accuracy of the initial 227 cases.
    Rodney WM; Prislin MD; Orientale E; McConnell M; Hahn RG
    J Fam Pract; 1990 Feb; 30(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 2405093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Residency training as technology matures a survey of radiology residents' training experiences.
    Green GE; Forman HP
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):874-9. PubMed ID: 16777562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.