203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11271930)
1. Tonometry in normal and scarred corneas, and in postkeratoplasty eyes: a comparative study of the Goldmann, the ProTon and the Schiotz tonometers.
Jain AK; Saini JS; Gupta R
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 48(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 11271930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties.
Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 18222191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [A new site-independent tonometer (ProTon) in comparison with the Goldmann applanation tonometer].
Gräf M; Wassill H; Dick B
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1995 Apr; 206(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 7791286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus and postkeratoplasty eyes.
Meyenberg A; Iliev ME; Eschmann R; Frueh BE
Cornea; 2008 Apr; 27(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 18362658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers.
Harada Y; Hirose N; Kubota T; Tawara A
J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by non-contact air puff versus Goldmann applanation tonometers in gas-filled vitrectomized eyes.
Patikulsila D; Taweemankongsab S; Ngamtipakorn S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 May; 86(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 12859105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Ku JY; Danesh-Meyer HV; Craig JP; Gamble GD; McGhee CN
Eye (Lond); 2006 Feb; 20(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 15803173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Disposable devices for measuring intraocular pressure: a clinical study to assess their accuracy.
Bhatnagar A; Gupta AK
Eye (Lond); 2005 Jul; 19(7):752-4. PubMed ID: 15359247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers.
Ko YC; Liu CJ; Hsu WM
Eye (Lond); 2005 Mar; 19(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 15258603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraocular pressure measurements with the newly reconfigured Ocuton S*TT-MV self-tonometer in comparison to Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients.
Lanfermann E; Jürgens C; Grossjohann R; Antal S; Tost F
Med Sci Monit; 2009 Nov; 15(11):CR556-62. PubMed ID: 19865054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical comparison of the Icare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Pakrou N; Gray T; Mills R; Landers J; Craig J
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18303384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Reproducibility of dynamic contour tonometry. Comparison with TonoPenXL and Goldmann applanation tonometry - a clinical study on 323 normal eyes].
Viestenz A; Langenbucher A; Viestenz A
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Oct; 223(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 17063423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of the rebound, noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers in routine clinical practice.
Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Jimenez-Santos M; Saenz-Frances F; Matilla-Rodero M; Mendez-Hernandez C; Herrero-Vanrell R; Garcia-Feijoo J
Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 89(7):676-80. PubMed ID: 19900196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice.
Halkiadakis I; Patsea E; Chatzimichali K; Skouriotis S; Chalkidou S; Amariotakis G; Papakonstadinou D; Theodossiadis G; Amariotakis A; Georgopoulos G
Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 87(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 18631335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the pressure phosphene tonometer as a self-tonometer.
Naruse S; Mori K; Kinoshita S
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 16101948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty.
Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Miani F; Tosoni C; Parisi L; Brusini P
Eye (Lond); 2011 May; 25(5):642-50. PubMed ID: 21436848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rebound, applanation, and dynamic contour tonometry in pathologic corneas.
Rosentreter A; Athanasopoulos A; Schild AM; Lappas A; Cursiefen C; Dietlein TS
Cornea; 2013 Mar; 32(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 22673854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Prospective comparison of the new indentation tonometer TGdC-01, the non-contact tonometer PT100 and the conventional Goldmann applanation tonometer].
Müller A; Godenschweger L; Lang GE; Kampmeier J
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Sep; 221(9):762-8. PubMed ID: 15459844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of proton and goldmann applanation tonometers in normal and postkeratoplasty eyes.
Pandav SS; Sharma A; Gupta A; Sharma SK; Gupta A; Patnaik B
Ophthalmology; 2002 May; 109(5):979-84. PubMed ID: 11986107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
