BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11271967)

  • 1. Reports of alcohol-related harm: telephone versus face-to-face interviews.
    Midanik LT; Greenfield TK; Rogers JD
    J Stud Alcohol; 2001 Jan; 62(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 11271967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Telephone versus in-person interviews for alcohol use: results of the 2000 National Alcohol Survey.
    Midanik LT; Greenfield TK
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2003 Dec; 72(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 14643937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of telephone versus face-to-face interview modes on reports of alcohol consumption.
    Greenfield TK; Midanik LT; Rogers JD
    Addiction; 2000 Feb; 95(2):277-84. PubMed ID: 10723856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are differences in population prevalence of alcohol's harm to others related to survey administration mode?
    Sundin E; Landberg J; Galanti MR; Room R; Ramstedt M
    Drug Alcohol Rev; 2018 Mar; 37(3):375-381. PubMed ID: 28488279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nonresponse in a follow-up to a representative telephone survey of adult drinkers.
    Wild TC; Cunningham J; Adlaf E
    J Stud Alcohol; 2001 Mar; 62(2):257-61. PubMed ID: 11327192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Missed and inconsistent classification of current drinkers: results from the 2005 US National Alcohol Survey.
    Midanik LT; Ye Y; Greenfield TK; Kerr W
    Addiction; 2013 Feb; 108(2):348-55. PubMed ID: 22974256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. AIDS and behavioural risk factors in women in inner city Baltimore: a comparison of telephone and face to face surveys.
    Nebot M; Celentano DD; Burwell L; Davis A; Davis M; Polacsek M; Santelli J
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Aug; 48(4):412-8. PubMed ID: 7964343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of survey mode on self-reports of adult alcohol consumption: a comparison of mail, web and telephone approaches.
    Link MW; Mokdad AH
    J Stud Alcohol; 2005 Mar; 66(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 15957675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The alcohol harm paradox: using a national survey to explore how alcohol may disproportionately impact health in deprived individuals.
    Bellis MA; Hughes K; Nicholls J; Sheron N; Gilmore I; Jones L
    BMC Public Health; 2016 Feb; 16():111. PubMed ID: 26888538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems: comparison of responses from self-administered questionnaires and telephone interviews.
    Kraus L; Augustin R
    Addiction; 2001 Mar; 96(3):459-71. PubMed ID: 11255585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Defining 'current drinkers' in national surveys: results of the 2000 National Alcohol Survey.
    Midanik LT; Greenfield TK
    Addiction; 2003 Apr; 98(4):517-22. PubMed ID: 12653821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Use of Multimode Data Collection in Random Digit Dialing Cell Phone Surveys for Young Adults: Feasibility Study.
    Gundersen DA; Wivagg J; Young WJ; Yan T; Delnevo CD
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Dec; 23(12):e31545. PubMed ID: 34932017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can the accuracy of health behaviour surveys be improved by non-response follow-ups?
    Helakorpi S; Mäkelä P; Holstila A; Uutela A; Vartiainen E
    Eur J Public Health; 2015 Jun; 25(3):487-90. PubMed ID: 25477127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of results from an alcohol survey of a prerecruited Internet panel and the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.
    Heeren T; Edwards EM; Dennis JM; Rodkin S; Hingson RW; Rosenbloom DL
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2008 Feb; 32(2):222-9. PubMed ID: 18162076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring alcohol-related harm: test-retest reliability of a popular measure.
    Bondy SJ; Lange P
    Subst Use Misuse; 2000 Aug; 35(9):1263-75. PubMed ID: 11349684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The identification of alcohol dependence criteria in the general population.
    Caetano R
    Addiction; 1999 Feb; 94(2):255-67. PubMed ID: 10396793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does the association between alcohol consumption and depression depend on how they are measured?
    Graham K; Massak A; Demers A; Rehm J
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2007 Jan; 31(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 17207105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing bias in telephone survey estimates of the prevalence of drug use: a randomized trial of telephone audio-CASI.
    Turner CF; Villarroel MA; Rogers SM; Eggleston E; Ganapathi L; Roman AM; Al-Tayyib A
    Addiction; 2005 Oct; 100(10):1432-44. PubMed ID: 16185205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Drinking patterns and perspectives on alcohol policy: results from two Ontario surveys.
    Giesbrecht N; Ialomiteanu A; Anglin L
    Alcohol Alcohol; 2005; 40(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 15582986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age of drinking onset, alcohol use disorders, frequent heavy drinking, and unintentionally injuring oneself and others after drinking.
    Hingson RW; Zha W
    Pediatrics; 2009 Jun; 123(6):1477-84. PubMed ID: 19482757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.