93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11272619)
1. Biologic patterns of disability.
Granger CV; Linn RT
J Outcome Meas; 2000; 4(2):595-615. PubMed ID: 11272619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cross-diagnostic validity in a generic instrument: an example from the Functional Independence Measure in Scandinavia.
Lundgren-Nilsson A; Tennant A; Grimby G; Sunnerhagen KS
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2006 Aug; 4():55. PubMed ID: 16928268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance profiles of the functional independence measure.
Granger CV; Hamilton BB; Linacre JM; Heinemann AW; Wright BD
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1993 Apr; 72(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 8476548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring disability in Medicare home care patients: application of Rasch modeling to the outcome and assessment information set.
Fortinsky RH; Garcia RI; Joseph Sheehan T; Madigan EA; Tullai-McGuinness S
Med Care; 2003 May; 41(5):601-15. PubMed ID: 12719685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Establishing score equivalence of the Functional Independence Measure motor scale and the Barthel Index, utilising the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and Rasch measurement theory.
Prodinger B; O'Connor RJ; Stucki G; Tennant A
J Rehabil Med; 2017 May; 49(5):416-422. PubMed ID: 28471470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Self-scoring templates for motor and cognitive subscales of the FIM instrument for persons with spinal cord injury.
Bode RK; Heinemann AW; Kozlowski AJ; Pretz CR
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Apr; 95(4):676-679.e5. PubMed ID: 24309071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differential item functioning of the Functional Independence Measure in higher performing neurological patients.
Dallmeijer AJ; Dekker J; Roorda LD; Knol DL; van Baalen B; de Groot V; Schepers VP; Lankhorst GJ
J Rehabil Med; 2005 Nov; 37(6):346-52. PubMed ID: 16287665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does the functional assessment measure (FAM) extend the functional independence measure (FIM) instrument? A rasch analysis of stroke inpatients.
Linn RT; Blair RS; Granger CV; Harper DW; O'Hara PA; Maciura E
J Outcome Meas; 1999; 3(4):339-59. PubMed ID: 10572386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Daily activities in women with rheumatoid arthritis. Aspects of patient education, assistive devices and methods for disability and impairment assessment.
Nordenskiöld U
Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl; 1997; 37():1-72. PubMed ID: 9428052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationships between independence level of single motor-FIM items and FIM-motor scores in patients with hemiplegia after stroke: an ordinal logistic modelling study.
Koyama T; Matsumoto K; Okuno T; Domen K
J Rehabil Med; 2006 Sep; 38(5):280-6. PubMed ID: 16931457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. FIM levels as ordinal categories.
Linacre JM
J Outcome Meas; 2000; 4(2):616-33. PubMed ID: 11272620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adaptation of the modified Barthel Index for use in physical medicine and rehabilitation in Turkey.
Küçükdeveci AA; Yavuzer G; Tennant A; Süldür N; Sonel B; Arasil T
Scand J Rehabil Med; 2000 Jun; 32(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 10853723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cross-cultural validity of functional independence measure items in stroke: a study using Rasch analysis.
Lundgren-Nilsson A; Grimby G; Ring H; Tesio L; Lawton G; Slade A; Penta M; Tripolski M; Biering-Sørensen F; Carter J; Marincek C; Phillips S; Simone A; Tennant A
J Rehabil Med; 2005 Jan; 37(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 15788329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A computer adaptive testing simulation applied to the FIM instrument motor component.
Dijkers MP
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Mar; 84(3):384-93. PubMed ID: 12638107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dimensionality and hierarchical structure of disability measurement.
van Boxel YJ; Roest FH; Bergen MP; Stam HJ
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1995 Dec; 76(12):1152-5. PubMed ID: 8540793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tracking functional status across the spinal cord injury lifespan: linking pediatric and adult patient-reported outcome scores.
Tian F; Ni P; Mulcahey MJ; Hambleton RK; Tulsky D; Haley SM; Jette AM
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Nov; 95(11):2078-2085.e15. PubMed ID: 24933214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhancing the usefulness of the Mini-BESTest for measuring dynamic balance: a Rasch validation study.
Franchignoni F; Godi M; Guglielmetti S; Nardone A; Giordano A
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Aug; 51(4):429-37. PubMed ID: 25653078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Structure of a combination of Functional Independence Measure and Instrumental Activity Measure items in community-living persons: a study of individuals with cerebral palsy and spina bifida.
Grimby G; Andrén E; Holmgren E; Wright B; Linacre JM; Sundh V
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1996 Nov; 77(11):1109-14. PubMed ID: 8931519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Functional ability level development and validation: providing clinical meaning for Spinal Cord Injury Functional Index scores.
Sinha R; Slavin MD; Kisala PA; Ni P; Tulsky DS; Jette AM
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Aug; 96(8):1448-57. PubMed ID: 25431830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Towards the development of clinical measures for spinal cord injury based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health with Rasch analyses.
Ballert CS; Stucki G; Biering-Sørensen F; Cieza A
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Sep; 95(9):1685-94. PubMed ID: 24882520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
