137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11272718)
1. Active surveillance of birth defects among U.S. Department of Defense beneficiaries: a feasibility study.
Bush RA; Smith TC; Honner WK; Gray GC
Mil Med; 2001 Feb; 166(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 11272718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Department of Defense Birth Defects Registry: overview of a new surveillance system.
Ryan MA; Pershyn-Kisor MA; Honner WK; Smith TC; Reed RJ; Gray GC
Teratology; 2001; 64 Suppl 1():S26-9. PubMed ID: 11745841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Birth defects prevalence among infants of Persian Gulf War veterans born in Hawaii, 1989-1993.
Araneta MR; Destiche DA; Schlangen KM; Merz RD; Forrester MB; Gray GC
Teratology; 2000 Oct; 62(4):195-204. PubMed ID: 10992261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prevalence of birth defects among infants of Gulf War veterans in Arkansas, Arizona, California, Georgia, Hawaii, and Iowa, 1989-1993.
Araneta MR; Schlangen KM; Edmonds LD; Destiche DA; Merz RD; Hobbs CA; Flood TJ; Harris JA; Krishnamurti D; Gray GC
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2003 Apr; 67(4):246-60. PubMed ID: 12854660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Accuracy of Hospital Discharge Diagnosis Codes for Major Birth Defects: Evaluation of a Statewide Registry With Passive Case Ascertainment.
Salemi JL; Tanner JP; Sampat D; Anjohrin SB; Correia JA; Watkins SM; Kirby RS
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2016; 22(3):E9-E19. PubMed ID: 26125231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and implementation of the first national data quality standards for population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States.
Anderka M; Mai CT; Romitti PA; Copeland G; Isenburg J; Feldkamp ML; Krikov S; Rickard R; Olney RS; Canfield MA; Stanton C; Mosley B; Kirby RS
BMC Public Health; 2015 Sep; 15():925. PubMed ID: 26386816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Birth defects in infants born in 1998-2004 to men and women serving in the U.S. military during the 1990-1991 Gulf War era.
Bukowinski AT; DeScisciolo C; Conlin AM; K Ryan MA; Sevick CJ; Smith TC
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2012 Sep; 94(9):721-8. PubMed ID: 22903974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of preterm births and birth defects in liveborn infants of US military women who received smallpox vaccine.
Ryan MA; Gumbs GR; Conlin AM; Sevick CJ; Jacobson IG; Snell KJ; Spooner CN; Smith TC;
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2008 Jul; 82(7):533-9. PubMed ID: 18496830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Birth defects among infants born to women who received anthrax vaccine in pregnancy.
Ryan MA; Smith TC; Sevick CJ; Honner WK; Loach RA; Moore CA; Erickson JD
Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 168(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 18599489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hospital discharge data: can it serve as the sole source of case ascertainment for population-based birth defects surveillance programs?
Wang Y; Cross PK; Druschel CM
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2010; 16(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 20357611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of defects identified through Minnesota's Birth Defects Information System And Vital Records, 2006-2008.
Banerjee E; Zabel E; Alexander B
J Registry Manag; 2012; 39(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 23270085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An evaluation of congenital malformations surveillance in New York State: an application of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for evaluating surveillance systems.
Sekhobo JP; Druschel CM
Public Health Rep; 2001; 116(4):296-305. PubMed ID: 12037258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Developing a database management system to support birth defects surveillance in Florida.
Salemi JL; Hauser KW; Tanner JP; Sampat D; Correia JA; Watkins SM; Kirby RS
J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):10-5; quiz 38-9. PubMed ID: 20795564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving case ascertainment of a population-based birth defects registry in New York State using hospital discharge data.
Wang Y; Sharpe-Stimac M; Cross PK; Druschel CM; Hwang SA
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2005 Oct; 73(10):663-8. PubMed ID: 16240383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Completeness and accuracy of the birth registry data on congenital anomalies in Alberta, Canada.
Wang FL; Gabos S; Sibbald B; Lowry RB
Chronic Dis Can; 2001; 22(2):57-66. PubMed ID: 11525721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program: 35 years of birth defects surveillance at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Correa-Villaseñor A; Cragan J; Kucik J; O'Leary L; Siffel C; Williams L
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2003 Sep; 67(9):617-24. PubMed ID: 14703783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Registry data quality improvement by identifying discrepancies between assigned codes and text descriptions of birth defects.
Richardson SD; Fox DJ; Wittman B
J Registry Manag; 2013; 40(4):165-7. PubMed ID: 24625769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the Texas Birth Defects Registry: an active surveillance system.
Miller E
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):787-92. PubMed ID: 17094140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Population and case-control surveillance in the search for environmental causes of birth defects.
Oakley GP
Public Health Rep; 1984; 99(5):465-8. PubMed ID: 6207556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Methodological issues in setting up a surveillance system for birth defects in India.
Suresh S; Thangavel G; Sujatha J; Indrani S
Natl Med J India; 2005; 18(5):259-62. PubMed ID: 16433142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
