These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11272750)

  • 1. A Monte Carlo investigation of the Fisher Z transformation for normal and nonnormal distributions.
    Berry KJ; Mielke PW
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Dec; 87(3 Pt 2):1101-14. PubMed ID: 11272750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confidence intervals for correlations when data are not normal.
    Bishara AJ; Hittner JB
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Feb; 49(1):294-309. PubMed ID: 26822671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reducing Bias and Error in the Correlation Coefficient Due to Nonnormality.
    Bishara AJ; Hittner JB
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Oct; 75(5):785-804. PubMed ID: 29795841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlation corrected for range restriction: a simulation study.
    Chan W; Chan DW
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):369-85. PubMed ID: 15355154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing the significance of a correlation with nonnormal data: comparison of Pearson, Spearman, transformation, and resampling approaches.
    Bishara AJ; Hittner JB
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Sep; 17(3):399-417. PubMed ID: 22563845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Monte Carlo investigation of the robustness of the Wald, likelihood Ratio, and Median tests with specified symmetric and asymmetric marginal distributions.
    Reed JF
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1993 Apr; 39(3-4):131-6. PubMed ID: 8334867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How accurate is the Pearson r-from-Z approximation? A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Hittner JB; May K
    J Gen Psychol; 2012; 139(2):68-77. PubMed ID: 24836910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect-size indices for dichotomized outcomes in meta-analysis.
    Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Chacón-Moscoso S
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):448-67. PubMed ID: 14664682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Asymptotic confidence intervals for the Pearson correlation via skewness and kurtosis.
    Bishara AJ; Li J; Nash T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):167-185. PubMed ID: 28872186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Meta-analysis of correlations revisited: attempted replication and extension of Field's (2001) simulation studies.
    Hafdahl AR; Williams MA
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Mar; 14(1):24-42. PubMed ID: 19271846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Random-effects meta-analysis of correlations: Monte Carlo evaluation of mean estimators.
    Hafdahl AR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):227-54. PubMed ID: 19527563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parametric modelling of cost data in medical studies.
    Nixon RM; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(8):1311-31. PubMed ID: 15083485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Should we rely on the Kenward-Roger approximation when using linear mixed models if the groups have different distributions?
    Arnau J; Bendayan R; Blanca MJ; Bono R
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Nov; 67(3):408-29. PubMed ID: 24028625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation coefficient inference on censored bioassay data.
    Li L; Wang WW; Chan IS
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(3):501-12. PubMed ID: 15920894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Examining Nonnormal Latent Variable Distributions for Non-Ignorable Missing Data.
    Liu CW
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 May; 45(3):159-177. PubMed ID: 33958834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data.
    Enders CK
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):352-70. PubMed ID: 11778677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bootstrapping to test for nonzero population correlation coefficients using univariate sampling.
    Beasley WH; DeShea L; Toothaker LE; Mendoza JL; Bard DE; Rodgers JL
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Dec; 12(4):414-433. PubMed ID: 18179352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimated distributions for total body surface area of men and women in the United States.
    Murray DM; Burmaster DE
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1992; 2(4):451-61. PubMed ID: 1483029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlations corrected for indirect range restriction.
    Li JC; Chan W; Cui Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):367-87. PubMed ID: 21973092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Profile likelihood-based confidence intervals using Monte Carlo integration for population pharmacokinetic parameters.
    Funatogawa T; Funatogawa I; Yafune A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(2):193-205. PubMed ID: 16584067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.