These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11273438)
1. Misconduct in science and the German law. Stegemann-Boehl S Sci Eng Ethics; 2000 Jan; 6(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 11273438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fraud and misconduct in scientific research: a definition and procedures for investigation. Catano VM; Turk J Med Law; 2007 Sep; 26(3):465-76. PubMed ID: 17970246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safeguarding good scientific practice: new institutional approaches in Germany. Schneider C Sci Eng Ethics; 2000 Jan; 6(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 11273436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evolving research misconduct policies and their significance for physical scientists. Dooley JJ; Kerch HM Sci Eng Ethics; 2000 Jan; 6(1):109-21. PubMed ID: 11273428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The ethics of scientific research: an analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives. Wenger NS; Korenman SG; Berk R; Berry S J Investig Med; 1997 Aug; 45(6):371-80. PubMed ID: 9291693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientific Misconduct. Gross C Annu Rev Psychol; 2016; 67():693-711. PubMed ID: 26273897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct. Sovacool BK Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An ethical analysis of the phenomenon of misconduct in research. Forsman B Acta Oncol; 1999; 38(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 10090697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The problem of plagiarism. Anderson MS; Steneck NH Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 21194643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Research misconduct and the scientific process: continuing quality improvement. Koppelman-White E Account Res; 2006; 13(3):225-46. PubMed ID: 17124759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The legal basis for the Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty. Brydensholt HH; Sci Eng Ethics; 2000 Jan; 6(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 11273429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. German task force outraged by changes to science fraud report. Schiermeier Q Nature; 2002 Jan; 415(6867):3. PubMed ID: 11780073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The discipline of science: law or profession? Davis M Account Res; 1990 Oct; 1(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 15991409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct. Resnik DB Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Federal agencies can do more to ensure correction of the literature when research misconduct is found. Parrish DM Account Res; 2018; 25(6):370-372. PubMed ID: 30064271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Medical Research Council's approach to allegations of scientific misconduct. Evans I Sci Eng Ethics; 2000 Jan; 6(1):91-4. PubMed ID: 11273442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Public Health Service policies on research misconduct. Final rule. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Fed Regist; 2005 May; 70(94):28369-400. PubMed ID: 15898182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Curbing misconduct in the pharmaceutical industry: insights from behavioral ethics and the behavioral approach to law. Feldman Y; Gauthier R; Schuler T J Law Med Ethics; 2013; 41(3):620-8. PubMed ID: 24088152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Commentary: Legacy of the Commission on Research Integrity. Redman BK Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Apr; 23(2):555-563. PubMed ID: 26758253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Research ethics. Germany gets in step with scientific misconduct rules. Bostanci A Science; 2002 Jun; 296(5574):1778. PubMed ID: 12052923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]