These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11273442)

  • 1. The Medical Research Council's approach to allegations of scientific misconduct.
    Evans I
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2000 Jan; 6(1):91-4. PubMed ID: 11273442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. Conduct unbecoming--the MRC's approach.
    Evans I
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1728-9. PubMed ID: 9652921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Management of research misconduct--in practice.
    Wells FO
    J Intern Med; 1994 Feb; 235(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 8308473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Seven ways to plagiarize: handling real allegations of research misconduct.
    Loui MC
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2002 Oct; 8(4):529-39. PubMed ID: 12501721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Editors call for misconduct watchdog.
    Williams N
    Science; 1998 Jun; 280(5370):1685-6. PubMed ID: 9660704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sanctions for research misconduct: a legal perspective.
    Dresser R
    Acad Med; 1993 Sep; 68(9 Suppl):S39-43. PubMed ID: 8396938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Responding to allegations of scientific misconduct: the procedure at the French National Medical and Health Research Institute.
    Breittmayer JP; Bungener M; De The H; Eschwege E; Fougereau M; Guedj G; Kordon C; Philippe O; Postel-Vinay MC; Schaffar-Esterle L;
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2000 Jan; 6(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 11273435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time to face up to research misconduct.
    Smith R
    BMJ; 1996 Mar; 312(7034):789-90. PubMed ID: 8608272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the seriousness of research misconduct: considerations for sanction assignment.
    Keranen L
    Account Res; 2006; 13(2):179-205. PubMed ID: 16830407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fraud and misconduct in scientific research: a definition and procedures for investigation.
    Catano VM; Turk J
    Med Law; 2007 Sep; 26(3):465-76. PubMed ID: 17970246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the oversight of scientific misconduct.
    Redman BK; Merz JF
    Account Res; 2005; 12(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 16634167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving biomedical journals' ethical policies: the case of research misconduct.
    Bosch X
    J Med Ethics; 2014 Sep; 40(9):644-6. PubMed ID: 24505117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. Deception: difficulties and initiatives.
    Chantler C; Chantler S
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1731-2. PubMed ID: 9652923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An editor's response to fraudsters.
    Farthing MJ
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1729-31. PubMed ID: 9652922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolving research misconduct policies and their significance for physical scientists.
    Dooley JJ; Kerch HM
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2000 Jan; 6(1):109-21. PubMed ID: 11273428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fraud in medicine. Coping with fraud.
    Farthing MJ
    Lancet; 1998 Dec 19-26; 352 Suppl 4():SIV11. PubMed ID: 9872158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MRC launches inquiry into animal experiments.
    Coghlan A
    New Sci; 1990 Jun; 126(1720):28. PubMed ID: 11655987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An American perspective on research integrity.
    Rennie D
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1726-8. PubMed ID: 9614029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct.
    Resnik DB
    Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How do Chinese universities address research integrity and misconduct? A review of university documents.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Dev World Bioeth; 2019 Jun; 19(2):64-75. PubMed ID: 31091553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.