These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11274683)

  • 1. The impact of sucrose-derived unconditioned and conditioned negative feedback on the microstructure of ingestive behavior.
    Davis JD; Smith GP; Singh B; McCann DL
    Physiol Behav; 2001 Feb; 72(3):393-402. PubMed ID: 11274683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of milk-derived unconditioned and conditioned negative feedback on the microstructure of ingestive behavior.
    Davis JD; Smith GP; Singh B; McCann DP
    Physiol Behav; 2000; 70(3-4):279-85. PubMed ID: 11006426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Type of negative feedback controlling sucrose ingestion depends on sucrose concentration.
    Davis JD; Smith GP; Singh B
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2000 Feb; 278(2):R383-9. PubMed ID: 10666139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Similar effect of raclopride and reduced sucrose concentration on the microstructure of sucrose sham feeding.
    Schneider LH; Davis JD; Watson CA; Smith GP
    Eur J Pharmacol; 1990 Sep; 186(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 2282936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pharmacology of flavor preference conditioning in sham-feeding rats: effects of naltrexone.
    Yu WZ; Sclafani A; Delamater AR; Bodnar RJ
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1999 Nov; 64(3):573-84. PubMed ID: 10548274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orosensory stimulation is sufficient and postingestive negative feedback is not necessary for neuropeptide Y to increase sucrose intake.
    Torregrossa AM; Davis JD; Smith GP
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Apr; 87(4):773-80. PubMed ID: 16540131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intracerebroventricular glucagon-like peptide-1 (7-36) amide inhibits sham feeding in rats without eliciting satiety.
    Asarian L; Corp ES; Hrupka B; Geary N
    Physiol Behav; 1998 Jun; 64(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 9748106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Flavor preferences conditioned by sucrose depend upon training and testing methods: two-bottle tests revisited.
    Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2002 Aug; 76(4-5):633-44. PubMed ID: 12127003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Postpyloric stimuli are necessary for the normal control of meal size in real feeding and sham feeding rats.
    Davis JD; Smith GP; Miesner J
    Am J Physiol; 1993 Oct; 265(4 Pt 2):R888-95. PubMed ID: 8238462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flavor-postingestive consequence associations incorporate the behaviorally opposing effects of positive reinforcement and anticipated satiety: implications for interpreting two-bottle tests.
    Warwick ZS; Weingarten HP
    Physiol Behav; 1996 Sep; 60(3):711-5. PubMed ID: 8873241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interactions between conditioned and unconditioned flavor preferences.
    Harris JA; Thein T
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):407-17. PubMed ID: 16248727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parabrachial Nucleus Contributions to Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist-Induced Hypophagia.
    Swick JC; Alhadeff AL; Grill HJ; Urrea P; Lee SM; Roh H; Baird JP
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2015 Jul; 40(8):2001-14. PubMed ID: 25703200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Operant responding for conditioned and unconditioned reinforcers in rats is differentially enhanced by the primary reinforcing and reinforcement-enhancing effects of nicotine.
    Chaudhri N; Caggiula AR; Donny EC; Booth S; Gharib M; Craven L; Palmatier MI; Liu X; Sved AF
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2006 Nov; 189(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 17019569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of the dopamine D1-like receptor antagonist SCH 23390 on the microstructure of ingestive behaviour in water-deprived rats licking for water and NaCl solutions.
    Galistu A; D'Aquila PS
    Physiol Behav; 2012 Jan; 105(2):230-3. PubMed ID: 21864553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learned suppression of intake based on anticipated calories: cross-nutrient comparisons.
    Warwick ZS; Bowen KJ; Synowski SJ
    Physiol Behav; 1997 Dec; 62(6):1319-24. PubMed ID: 9383120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning to sham feed: behavioral adjustments to loss of physiological postingestional stimuli.
    Davis JD; Smith GP
    Am J Physiol; 1990 Dec; 259(6 Pt 2):R1228-35. PubMed ID: 2260733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pharmacology of flavor preference conditioning in sham-feeding rats: effects of dopamine receptor antagonists.
    Yu WZ; Silva RM; Sclafani A; Delamater AR; Bodnar RJ
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2000 Apr; 65(4):635-47. PubMed ID: 10764916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of sucrose concentration and water deprivation on Pavlovian conditioning and responding for conditioned reinforcement.
    Tabbara RI; Maddux JM; Beharry PF; Iannuzzi J; Chaudhri N
    Behav Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 130(2):231-42. PubMed ID: 26913541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The acquired control of ingestive behavior in the rat by flavor-associated postingestional stimulation.
    Davis JD; Perez MC
    Physiol Behav; 1993 Dec; 54(6):1221-6. PubMed ID: 8295968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The neurotensin receptor agonist NT69L suppresses sucrose-reinforced operant behavior in the rat.
    Boules M; Iversen I; Oliveros A; Shaw A; Williams K; Robinson J; Fredrickson P; Richelson E
    Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 1127(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 17113052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.