BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11275339)

  • 1. An EMG technique for measuring spinal loading during asymmetric lifting.
    Dolan P; Kingma I; De Looze MP; van Dieen JH; Toussaint HM; Baten CT; Adams MA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2001; 16 Suppl 1():S17-24. PubMed ID: 11275339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relationship between EMG activity and extensor moment generation in the erector spinae muscles during bending and lifting activities.
    Dolan P; Adams MA
    J Biomech; 1993; 26(4-5):513-22. PubMed ID: 8478353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic forces acting on the lumbar spine during manual handling. Can they be estimated using electromyographic techniques alone?
    Dolan P; Kingma I; van Dieen J; de Looze MP; Toussaint HM; Baten CT; Adams MA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Apr; 24(7):698-703. PubMed ID: 10209801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bending and compressive stresses acting on the lumbar spine during lifting activities.
    Dolan P; Earley M; Adams MA
    J Biomech; 1994 Oct; 27(10):1237-48. PubMed ID: 7962011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Passive tissues help the back muscles to generate extensor moments during lifting.
    Dolan P; Mannion AF; Adams MA
    J Biomech; 1994 Aug; 27(8):1077-85. PubMed ID: 8089162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of on-body lift assistive device on the lumbar 3D dynamic moments and EMG during asymmetric freestyle lifting.
    Abdoli-E M; Stevenson JM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Mar; 23(3):372-80. PubMed ID: 18093709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repetitive lifting tasks fatigue the back muscles and increase the bending moment acting on the lumbar spine.
    Dolan P; Adams MA
    J Biomech; 1998 Aug; 31(8):713-21. PubMed ID: 9796671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An EMG-assisted model of trunk loading during free-dynamic lifting.
    Granata KP; Marras WS
    J Biomech; 1995 Nov; 28(11):1309-17. PubMed ID: 8522544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of a lifting belt on spine moments and muscle recruitments after unexpected sudden loading.
    Lavender SA; Shakeel K; Andersson GB; Thomas JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jun; 25(12):1569-78. PubMed ID: 10851108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship between trunk muscle electromyography and lifting moments in the sagittal and frontal planes.
    Seroussi RE; Pope MH
    J Biomech; 1987; 20(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 3571294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trunk muscle response to lifting unbalanced loads with and without knowledge of centre of mass.
    Meyers BM; Keir PJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 Oct; 18(8):712-20. PubMed ID: 12957557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The in vivo dynamic response of the spine to perturbations causing rapid flexion: effects of pre-load and step input magnitude.
    Krajcarski SR; Potvin JR; Chiang J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1999 Jan; 14(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 10619090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flexion relaxation during lifting: implications for torque production by muscle activity and tissue strain at the lumbo-sacral joint.
    Toussaint HM; de Winter AF; de Haas Y; de Looze MP; Van Dieën JH; Kingma I
    J Biomech; 1995 Feb; 28(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 7896862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative ability of EMG, optimization, and hybrid modelling approaches to predict trunk muscle forces and lumbar spine loading during dynamic sagittal plane lifting.
    Gagnon D; Larivière C; Loisel P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2001 Jun; 16(5):359-72. PubMed ID: 11390042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating net lumbar sagittal plane moments from EMG data. The validity of calibration procedures.
    van Dieën JH; Visser B
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 1999 Oct; 9(5):309-15. PubMed ID: 10527212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lifting over an obstacle: effects of one-handed lifting and hand support on trunk kinematics and low back loading.
    Kingma I; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2004 Feb; 37(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 14706328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanically corrected EMG for the continuous estimation of erector spinae muscle loading during repetitive lifting.
    Potvin JR; Norman RW; McGill SM
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1996; 74(1-2):119-32. PubMed ID: 8891510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transverse-contour modeling of trunk muscle-distributed forces and spinal loads during lifting and twisting.
    Davis JR; Mirka GA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jan; 25(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 10685481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of biomechanical parameters in the lumbar spine during static sagittal plane lifting.
    Kong WZ; Goel VK; Gilbertson LG
    J Biomech Eng; 1998 Apr; 120(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 10412390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of work load and related factors during asymmetric lifting with surface electromyography].
    Chen J; Yang L
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 24(4):198-200. PubMed ID: 16701028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.