These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11275491)

  • 1. Syntactic parsing preferences and their on-line revisions: a spatio-temporal analysis of event-related brain potentials.
    Friederici AD; Mecklinger A; Spencer KM; Steinhauer K; Donchin E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2001 Apr; 11(2):305-23. PubMed ID: 11275491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Event-related brain potentials and case information in syntactic ambiguities.
    Hopf JM; Bayer J; Bader M; Meng M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1998 Mar; 10(2):264-80. PubMed ID: 9555111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is human sentence parsing serial or parallel? Evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Hopf JM; Bader M; Meng M; Bayer J
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Jan; 15(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 12429368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repair, revision, and complexity in syntactic analysis: an electrophysiological differentiation.
    Kaan E; Swaab TY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jan; 15(1):98-110. PubMed ID: 12590846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Beyond syntax: language-related positivities reflect the revision of hierarchies.
    Bornkessel I; Schlesewsky M; Friederici AD
    Neuroreport; 2002 Mar; 13(3):361-4. PubMed ID: 11930138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing.
    Osterhout L; Holcomb PJ; Swinney DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Jul; 20(4):786-803. PubMed ID: 8064247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural mechanisms of sentence comprehension based on predictive processes and decision certainty: Electrophysiological evidence from non-canonical linearizations in a flexible word order language.
    Dröge A; Fleischer J; Schlesewsky M; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I
    Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 1633():149-166. PubMed ID: 26740402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Event-related potentials elicited during parsing of ambiguous relative clauses in Spanish.
    Carreiras M; Salillas E; Barber H
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Jun; 20(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 15130594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The costs of freedom: an ERP -- study of non-canonical sentences.
    Matzke M; Mai H; Nager W; Rüsseler J; Münte T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Jun; 113(6):844-52. PubMed ID: 12048043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An ERP study of syntactic processing in English and nonsense sentences.
    Yamada Y; Neville HJ
    Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 1130(1):167-80. PubMed ID: 17173867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural correlates of syntactic processing in two-year-olds.
    Oberecker R; Friedrich M; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 17(10):1667-78. PubMed ID: 16269104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses.
    Friederici AD; Steinhauer K; Mecklinger A; Meyer M
    Biol Psychol; 1998 Mar; 47(3):193-221. PubMed ID: 9564450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Language related brain potentials in patients with cortical and subcortical left hemisphere lesions.
    Friederici AD; von Cramon DY; Kotz SA
    Brain; 1999 Jun; 122 ( Pt 6)():1033-47. PubMed ID: 10356057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The P600 as an indicator of syntactic ambiguity.
    Frisch S; Schlesewsky M; Saddy D; Alpermann A
    Cognition; 2002 Oct; 85(3):B83-92. PubMed ID: 12169415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Context-sensitive neural responses to conflict resolution: electrophysiological evidence from subject-object ambiguities in language comprehension.
    Schlesewsky M; Bornkessel I
    Brain Res; 2006 Jul; 1098(1):139-52. PubMed ID: 16765335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: a study with event-related potentials.
    Kolk HH; Chwilla DJ; van Herten M; Oor PJ
    Brain Lang; 2003 Apr; 85(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 12681346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Processing of temporary syntactic ambiguity in Italian "who"-questions: a study with event-related potentials.
    Penolazzi B; De Vincenzi M; Angrilli A; Job R
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Mar; 377(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 15740843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are semantic and syntactic cues inducing the same processes in the identification of word order?
    Casado P; Martín-Loeches M; Muñoz F; Fernández-Frías C
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):526-43. PubMed ID: 16099364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The P600 as a correlate of ventral attention network reorientation.
    Sassenhagen J; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I
    Cortex; 2015 May; 66():A3-A20. PubMed ID: 25791606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension.
    Tooley KM; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 19210079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.