164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11275802)
1. Reduced levels of glutathione S-transferases in patch test reactions to dithranol and sodium lauryl sulphate as demonstrated by quantitative immunocytochemistry: evidence for oxidative stress in acute irritant contact dermatitis.
Willis CM; Britton LE; Reiche L; Wilkinson JD
Eur J Dermatol; 2001; 11(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 11275802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Immunocytochemical demonstration of reduced Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase levels following topical application of dithranol and sodium lauryl sulphate: an indication of the role of oxidative stress in acute irritant contact dermatitis.
Willis CM; Reiche L; Wilkinson JD
Eur J Dermatol; 1998; 8(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 9649716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Skin susceptibility to dithranol: contact allergy or irritation?
Loffler H; Effendy I; Happle R
Eur J Dermatol; 1999; 9(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 9920984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 'Irritants' increase the response to an allergen in allergic contact dermatitis.
McLelland J; Shuster S; Matthews JN
Arch Dermatol; 1991 Jul; 127(7):1016-9. PubMed ID: 2064399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The MOAHLFA index of irritant sodium lauryl sulfate reactions: first results of a multicentre study on routine sodium lauryl sulfate patch testing.
Uter W; Geier J; Becker D; Brasch J; Löffler H
Contact Dermatitis; 2004; 51(5-6):259-62. PubMed ID: 15606650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contact thermography for assessment of skin damage due to experimental irritants.
Agner T; Serup J
Acta Derm Venereol; 1988; 68(3):192-5. PubMed ID: 2455410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Macro-video documentation patch tests.
Schuster C; Kränke B; Szolar-Platzer C; Aberer W
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):177-83. PubMed ID: 15859988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of ultraviolet B on nonimmunologic contact reactions induced by dimethyl sulphoxide, phenol and sodium lauryl sulphate.
Larmi E; Lahti A; Hannuksela M
Photodermatol; 1989 Dec; 6(6):258-62. PubMed ID: 2636980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differential epidermal expression of the invariant chain in allergic and irritant contact dermatitis.
Emilson A; Lindberg M; Scheynius A
Acta Derm Venereol; 1998 Nov; 78(6):402-7. PubMed ID: 9833035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intra-individual variation of irritant threshold and relationship to transepidermal water loss measurement of skin irritation.
Smith HR; Rowson M; Basketter DA; McFadden JP
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 15291829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the course of the irritant reaction after irritation with sodium lauryl sulphate.
Gloor M; Senger B; Langenauer M; Fluhr JW
Skin Res Technol; 2004 Aug; 10(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 15225263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Allergic contact dermatitis from ophthalmic products: can pre-treatment with sodium lauryl sulfate increase patch test sensitivity?
Corazza M; Virgili A
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 May; 52(5):239-41. PubMed ID: 15898995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Telethermography: an objective method for evaluating patch test reactions.
Laino L; Di Carlo A
Eur J Dermatol; 2010; 20(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 20123644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nickel sulphate and epoxy resin: differences in iron status and glutathione redox ration at the time of patch testing.
Kaur S; Zilmer M; Eisen M; Rehema A; Kullisaar T; Vihalemm T; Zilmer K
Arch Dermatol Res; 2004 May; 295(12):517-20. PubMed ID: 15045513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of allergens and irritants on levels of natural moisturizing factor and corneocyte morphology.
Koppes SA; Ljubojević Hadžavdić S; Jakasa I; Franceschi N; Riethmüller C; Jurakić Tončic R; Marinovic B; Raj N; Rawlings AV; Voegeli R; Lane ME; Haftek M; Frings-Dresen MH; Rustemeyer T; Kezic S
Contact Dermatitis; 2017 May; 76(5):287-295. PubMed ID: 28295421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pitfalls of irritant patch testing using different test chamber sizes.
Löffler H; Freyschmidt-Paul P; Effendy I; Maibach HI
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Mar; 12(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 11244137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vivo cytokine profiles in allergic and irritant contact dermatitis.
Hoefakker S; Caubo M; van 't Erve EH; Roggeveen MJ; Boersma WJ; van Joost T; Notten WR; Claassen E
Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Oct; 33(4):258-66. PubMed ID: 8654078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical morphology of sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) and nonanoic acid (NAA) irritant patch test reactions at 48 h and 96 h in 152 subjects.
Reiche L; Willis C; Wilkinson J; Shaw S; de Lacharrière O
Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Nov; 39(5):240-3. PubMed ID: 9840260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Metallothionein I and II gene knock-out mice exhibit reduced tolerance to 24-h sodium lauryl sulphate patch testing.
Ma C; Li LF; Zhang BX
Clin Exp Dermatol; 2007 Jul; 32(4):417-22. PubMed ID: 17362230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
