These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11276031)

  • 21. Marginal analysis of incomplete longitudinal binary data: a cautionary note on LOCF imputation.
    Cook RJ; Zeng L; Yi GY
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):820-8. PubMed ID: 15339307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Semiparametric models for missing covariate and response data in regression models.
    Chen Q; Ibrahim JG
    Biometrics; 2006 Mar; 62(1):177-84. PubMed ID: 16542244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of imputation and modelling methods in the analysis of a physical activity trial with missing outcomes.
    Wood AM; White IR; Hillsdon M; Carpenter J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 15333619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sensitivity analysis of longitudinal normal data with drop-outs.
    Minini P; Chavance M
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(7):1039-54. PubMed ID: 15057877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An index of local sensitivity to non-ignorability for multivariate longitudinal mixed data with potential non-random dropout.
    Mahabadi SE; Ganjali M
    Stat Med; 2010 Jul; 29(17):1779-92. PubMed ID: 20658547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Semiparametric regression analysis of longitudinal data with informative drop-outs.
    Lin DY; Ying Z
    Biostatistics; 2003 Jul; 4(3):385-98. PubMed ID: 12925506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A local sensitivity analysis approach to longitudinal non-Gaussian data with non-ignorable dropout.
    Xie H
    Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(16):3155-77. PubMed ID: 17948917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis of non-ignorable missing and left-censored longitudinal data using a weighted random effects tobit model.
    Sattar A; Weissfeld LA; Molenberghs G
    Stat Med; 2011 Nov; 30(27):3167-80. PubMed ID: 21898524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The modification of diet in renal disease study.
    Klahr S
    N Engl J Med; 1989 Mar; 320(13):864-6. PubMed ID: 2494456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Multiple imputation compared with some informative dropout procedures in the estimation and comparison of rates of change in longitudinal clinical trials with dropouts.
    Ali MW; Siddiqui O
    J Biopharm Stat; 2000 May; 10(2):165-81. PubMed ID: 10803723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Performance of weighted estimating equations for longitudinal binary data with drop-outs missing at random.
    Preisser JS; Lohman KK; Rathouz PJ
    Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(20):3035-54. PubMed ID: 12369080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Analysis of longitudinal binary data with missing data due to dropouts.
    Ali MW; Talukder E
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):993-1007. PubMed ID: 16279357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intention-to-treat analyses for incomplete repeated measures data.
    Hogan JW; Laird NM
    Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):1002-17. PubMed ID: 8805765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Handling drop-out in longitudinal studies.
    Hogan JW; Roy J; Korkontzelou C
    Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(9):1455-97. PubMed ID: 15116353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
    Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
    Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Survival curve estimation for informatively coarsened discrete event-time data.
    Shardell M; Scharfstein DO; Bozzette SA
    Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(10):2184-202. PubMed ID: 16998829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Imputation strategies for blood pressure data nonignorably missing due to medication use.
    Cook NR
    Clin Trials; 2006; 3(5):411-20. PubMed ID: 17060215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An application of maximum likelihood and generalized estimating equations to the analysis of ordinal data from a longitudinal study with cases missing at random.
    Kenward MG; Lesaffre E; Molenberghs G
    Biometrics; 1994 Dec; 50(4):945-53. PubMed ID: 7787007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Simple adjustments for randomized trials with nonrandomly missing or censored outcomes arising from informative covariates.
    Baker SG; Fitzmaurice GM; Freedman LS; Kramer BS
    Biostatistics; 2006 Jan; 7(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 15923407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessment of relative improvement due to weights within generalized estimating equations framework for incomplete clinical trials data.
    Demirtas H
    J Biopharm Stat; 2004 Nov; 14(4):1085-98. PubMed ID: 15587981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.