These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11276744)
21. A 24-week prospective study comparing the stability of titanium dioxide grit-blasted dental implants with and without fluoride treatment. Geckili O; Bilhan H; Bilgin T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):684-8. PubMed ID: 19885409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Three-year radiologic follow-up of marginal bone loss around titanium dioxide grit-blasted dental implants with and without fluoride treatment. Geckili O; Bilhan H; Mumcu E; Bilgin T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):319-24. PubMed ID: 21483884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of the titanium Ti-6Al-7Nb alloy with and without plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating on growth and viability of cultured osteoblast-like cells. de Lavos-Valereto IC; Deboni MC; Azambuja N; Marques MM J Periodontol; 2002 Aug; 73(8):900-5. PubMed ID: 12211500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants. Orsini G; Assenza B; Scarano A; Piattelli M; Piattelli A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 11151575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of pH and elevated glucose levels on the electrochemical behavior of dental implants. Tamam E; Turkyilmaz I J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 24779948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Trabecular bone response to titanium implants with a thin carbonate-containing apatite coating applied using the molecular precursor method. Hayakawa T; Takahashi K; Yoshinari M; Okada H; Yamamoto H; Sato M; Nemoto K Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):851-8. PubMed ID: 17190294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Physical, mechanical, chemical, biological and optimal surface characteristics for bio-acceptability. Botha SJ J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1997 May; 52(5):273-82. PubMed ID: 9461946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. In vitro testing of restorative materials--what's the value? Powers JM J Esthet Restor Dent; 2012 Dec; 24(6):363-4. PubMed ID: 23205680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure. Sul YT; Johansson C; Wennerberg A; Cho LR; Chang BS; Albrektsson T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 15973946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bone response adjacent to calcium phosphate electrostatic spray deposition coated implants: an experimental study in goats. Manders PJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):548-53. PubMed ID: 16958695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biofilm formation on dental restorative and implant materials. Busscher HJ; Rinastiti M; Siswomihardjo W; van der Mei HC J Dent Res; 2010 Jul; 89(7):657-65. PubMed ID: 20448246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [What is thought of the various surface treatments of biomaterials used in dental and maxillofacial implantology?]. Muster D; Demri B; Moritz M; Hage-Ali M Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1998 Jul; 99 Suppl 1():89-93. PubMed ID: 9697238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Zirconia removable telescopic dentures retained on teeth or implants for maxilla rehabilitation. Three-year observation of three cases. Zafiropoulos GG; Rebbe J; Thielen U; Deli G; Beaumont C; Hoffmann O J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(6):455-65. PubMed ID: 20545536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Superior biocompatibility and osteogenic efficacy of micro-arc oxidation-treated titanium implants in the canine mandible. Ran W; Tian ZH; Guo B; Shu DL; Nan KH; Wang YJ Biomed Mater; 2009 Oct; 4(5):055003. PubMed ID: 19776490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Characterization of the surface properties of commercially available dental implants using scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. Jarmar T; Palmquist A; Brånemark R; Hermansson L; Engqvist H; Thomsen P Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 18254738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Surface chemistry effects of topographic modification of titanium dental implant surfaces: 2. In vitro experiments. Cassinelli C; Morra M; Bruzzone G; Carpi A; Di Santi G; Giardino R; Fini M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 12608668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Nonalloyed titanium as a bioinert metal--a review. Tschernitschek H; Borchers L; Geurtsen W Quintessence Int; 2005; 36(7-8):523-30. PubMed ID: 15997933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]