300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11276751)
1. Implant surfaces and interface processes.
Kasemo B; Gold J
Adv Dent Res; 1999 Jun; 13():8-20. PubMed ID: 11276751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Materials characteristics of uncoated/ceramic-coated implant materials.
Lacefield WR
Adv Dent Res; 1999 Jun; 13():21-6. PubMed ID: 11276742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Physical and biological characteristics of implant materials.
Keller JC
Adv Dent Res; 1999 Jun; 13():5-7. PubMed ID: 11276747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biofilm formation on dental restorative and implant materials.
Busscher HJ; Rinastiti M; Siswomihardjo W; van der Mei HC
J Dent Res; 2010 Jul; 89(7):657-65. PubMed ID: 20448246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exciting new developments at the 5th International Symposium on Surface and Interface of Biomaterials.
Grøndahl L; Kingshott P; Griesser HJ
Biointerphases; 2015 Dec; 10(4):04A101. PubMed ID: 26679721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Competitive protein adsorption on micro patterned polymeric biomaterials, and viscoelastic properties of tailor made extracellular matrices.
Welle A; Chiumiento A; Barbucci R
Biomol Eng; 2007 Feb; 24(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 16861035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Photocoupling of fibronectin to titanium surfaces influences keratinocyte adhesion, pellicle formation and thrombogenicity.
Scheideler L; Rupp F; Wendel HP; Sathe S; Geis-Gerstorfer J
Dent Mater; 2007 Apr; 23(4):469-78. PubMed ID: 16624401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterization of the surface properties of commercially available dental implants using scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy.
Jarmar T; Palmquist A; Brånemark R; Hermansson L; Engqvist H; Thomsen P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 18254738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Micropatterned silica thin films with nanohydroxyapatite micro-aggregates for guided tissue regeneration.
Carvalho A; Pelaez-Vargas A; Gallego-Perez D; Grenho L; Fernandes MH; De Aza AH; Ferraz MP; Hansford DJ; Monteiro FJ
Dent Mater; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1250-60. PubMed ID: 23026648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Soft tissue and epithelial models.
Jansen JA; den Braber ET; Walboomers XF; de Ruijter JE
Adv Dent Res; 1999 Jun; 13():57-66. PubMed ID: 11276748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hydroxyapatite and collagen combination-coated dental implants display better bone formation in the peri-implant area than the same combination plus bone morphogenetic protein-2-coated implants, hydroxyapatite only coated implants, and uncoated implants.
Lee SW; Hahn BD; Kang TY; Lee MJ; Choi JY; Kim MK; Kim SG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 72(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 24331565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Status of surface treatment in endosseous implant: a literary overview.
Gupta A; Dhanraj M; Sivagami G
Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(3):433-8. PubMed ID: 20930358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bone response adjacent to calcium phosphate electrostatic spray deposition coated implants: an experimental study in goats.
Manders PJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):548-53. PubMed ID: 16958695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adsorption and viscoelastic properties of fractionated mucin (BSM) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) studied with quartz crystal microbalance (QCM-D).
Feiler AA; Sahlholm A; Sandberg T; Caldwell KD
J Colloid Interface Sci; 2007 Nov; 315(2):475-81. PubMed ID: 17706239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Layer-by-layer self-assembly of minocycline-loaded chitosan/alginate multilayer on titanium substrates to inhibit biofilm formation.
Lv H; Chen Z; Yang X; Cen L; Zhang X; Gao P
J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1464-72. PubMed ID: 24930872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure.
Sul YT; Johansson C; Wennerberg A; Cho LR; Chang BS; Albrektsson T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 15973946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A review of nanostructured surfaces and materials for dental implants: surface coating, patterning and functionalization for improved performance.
Rasouli R; Barhoum A; Uludag H
Biomater Sci; 2018 May; 6(6):1312-1338. PubMed ID: 29744496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces.
Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1523-39. PubMed ID: 10632528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro changes of hydroxyapatite coatings.
Gross KA; Berndt CC; Goldschlag DD; Iacono VJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(5):589-97. PubMed ID: 9337018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
