BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11276753)

  • 1. Biomechanical and functional behavior of implants.
    Stanford CM
    Adv Dent Res; 1999 Jun; 13():88-92. PubMed ID: 11276753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Functional behaviour of bone around dental implants.
    Stanford CM; Schneider GB
    Gerodontology; 2004 Jun; 21(2):71-7. PubMed ID: 15185986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Equicrestal and subcrestal dental implants: a histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of nine retrieved human implants.
    Degidi M; Perrotti V; Shibli JA; Novaes AB; Piattelli A; Iezzi G
    J Periodontol; 2011 May; 82(5):708-15. PubMed ID: 21138355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Histologic observations of bone remodeling adjacent to endosteal dental implants.
    Steflik DE; Noel C; McBrayer C; Lake FT; Parr GR; Sisk AL; Hanes PJ
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(2):96-106. PubMed ID: 8699510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. LaminOss immediate-load implants: I. Introducing osteocompression in dentistry.
    Valen M; Locante WM
    J Oral Implantol; 2000; 26(3):177-84. PubMed ID: 11831318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiscale analyses of the bone-implant interface.
    Cha JY; Pereira MD; Smith AA; Houschyar KS; Yin X; Mouraret S; Brunski JB; Helms JA
    J Dent Res; 2015 Mar; 94(3):482-90. PubMed ID: 25628271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined effects of implant insertion depth and alveolar bone quality on periimplant bone strain induced by a wide-diameter, short implant and a narrow-diameter, long implant.
    Chou HY; Müftü S; Bozkaya D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Nov; 104(5):293-300. PubMed ID: 20970535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible.
    Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Schenk RK; Buser D; Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1372-83. PubMed ID: 11699479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of "all-on-four" concept and alternative designs with 3D finite element analysis method.
    Özdemir Doğan D; Polat NT; Polat S; Şeker E; Gül EB
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Aug; 16(4):501-10. PubMed ID: 23217013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of clinically relevant factors on the immediate biomechanical surrounding for a series of dental implant designs.
    Shunmugasamy VC; Gupta N; Pessoa RS; Janal MN; Coelho PG
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Mar; 133(3):031005. PubMed ID: 21303181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors influencing the preservation of the periimplant marginal bone.
    Hermann F; Lerner H; Palti A
    Implant Dent; 2007 Jun; 16(2):165-75. PubMed ID: 17563507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Toward an understanding of implant occlusion and strain adaptive bone modeling and remodeling.
    Stanford CM; Brand RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):553-61. PubMed ID: 10220659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Osteocyte density in the peri-implant bone of immediately loaded and submerged dental implants.
    Barros RR; Degidi M; Novaes AB; Piattelli A; Shibli JA; Iezzi G
    J Periodontol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):499-504. PubMed ID: 19254134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental-implant interface.
    Brunski JB
    Adv Dent Res; 1999 Jun; 13():99-119. PubMed ID: 11276755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate and compare implants placed in augmented versus non-augmented extraction sockets: 3-year results.
    Barone A; Orlando B; Cingano L; Marconcini S; Derchi G; Covani U
    J Periodontol; 2012 Jul; 83(7):836-46. PubMed ID: 22141358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bicortically stabilized implant load transfer.
    Jeong CM; Caputo AA; Wylie RS; Son SC; Jeon YC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 12608670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible.
    Hermann JS; Buser D; Schenk RK; Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 2000 Sep; 71(9):1412-24. PubMed ID: 11022770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do dental implants preserve and maintain alveolar bone?
    O'Neill JE; Yeung SC
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Nov; 2(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 25426893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bone level dental implant versus gingival crest level implant.
    Fernandes A
    Dent Today; 2011 Jun; 30(6):72-3. PubMed ID: 21761630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.