318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11276755)
1. In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental-implant interface.
Brunski JB
Adv Dent Res; 1999 Jun; 13():99-119. PubMed ID: 11276755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. II. Histologic analysis.
Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC
J Periodontol; 1997 Oct; 68(10):933-49. PubMed ID: 9358360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface.
Brunski JB
Clin Mater; 1992; 10(3):153-201. PubMed ID: 10149982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants.
Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative histomorphometric description of implant anchorage for three types of dental implants following 3 months of healing in baboons.
Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):777-84. PubMed ID: 9425758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic evaluation of interfacial bone healing around 3 different dental implants before and after radiation therapy.
Weinlaender M; Beumer J; Kenney EB; Lekovic V; Holmes R; Moy PK; Plenk H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 16634491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of strain generated in bone by "platform-switched" and "non-platform-switched" implants with straight and angulated abutments under vertical and angulated load: a finite element analysis study.
Paul S; Padmanabhan TV; Swarup S
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23852226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Histologic observations of bone remodeling adjacent to endosteal dental implants.
Steflik DE; Noel C; McBrayer C; Lake FT; Parr GR; Sisk AL; Hanes PJ
J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(2):96-106. PubMed ID: 8699510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experimental evidence for interfacial biochemical bonding in osseointegrated titanium implants.
Sul YT; Kwon DH; Kang BS; Oh SJ; Johansson C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():8-19. PubMed ID: 22093014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrastructural characterization of the implant interface response to loading.
Zhang X; Duyck J; Vandamme K; Naert I; Carmeliet G
J Dent Res; 2014 Mar; 93(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 24389808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early bone healing around 2 different experimental, HA grit-blasted, and dual acid-etched titanium implant surfaces. A pilot study in rabbits.
Gobbato L; Arguello E; Martin IS; Hawley CE; Griffin TJ
Implant Dent; 2012 Dec; 21(6):454-60. PubMed ID: 23149502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stability of the bone-implant complex. Results of longitudinal testing to 60 months with the Periotest device on endosseous dental implants.
Truhlar RS; Morris HF; Ochi S
Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):42-55. PubMed ID: 11885181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Guided bone regeneration around titanium plasma-sprayed, acid-etched, and hydroxyapatite-coated implants in the canine model.
Conner KA; Sabatini R; Mealey BL; Takacs VJ; Mills MP; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2003 May; 74(5):658-68. PubMed ID: 12816298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation of bone inelastic response in interaction phenomena with dental implants.
Natali AN; Carniel EL; Pavan PG
Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):561-9. PubMed ID: 18207565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multiscale analyses of the bone-implant interface.
Cha JY; Pereira MD; Smith AA; Houschyar KS; Yin X; Mouraret S; Brunski JB; Helms JA
J Dent Res; 2015 Mar; 94(3):482-90. PubMed ID: 25628271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A bioengineered implant for a predetermined bone cellular response to loading forces. A literature review and case report.
Misch CE; Bidez MW; Sharawy M
J Periodontol; 2001 Sep; 72(9):1276-86. PubMed ID: 11577963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces.
Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1523-39. PubMed ID: 10632528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vivo bone response and interfacial properties of titanium-alloy implant with different designs in rabbit model with time.
Chakraborty A; Kundu B; Basu D; Pal TK; Nandi SK
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):277-84. PubMed ID: 21891900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
