BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11276862)

  • 1. Interviewing children about real and fictitious events: revisiting the narrative elaboration procedure.
    Camparo LB; Wagner JT; Saywitz KJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Feb; 25(1):63-80. PubMed ID: 11276862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual differences in children's event memory reports and the narrative elaboration technique.
    Brown D; Pipe ME
    J Appl Psychol; 2003 Apr; 88(2):195-206. PubMed ID: 12731704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Encouraging more open-ended recall in child interviews.
    Canning HS; Peterson C
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2020; 27(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 32284781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interviewing preschoolers from low- and middle-SES communities: a test of the narrative elaboration recall improvement technique.
    Dorado JS; Saywitz KJ
    J Clin Child Psychol; 2001 Dec; 30(4):568-80. PubMed ID: 11708243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Context and cue cards in young children's testimony: a comparison of brief narrative elaboration and context reinstatement.
    Bowen CJ; Howie PM
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Dec; 87(6):1077-85. PubMed ID: 12558215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing the effects of drawing and verbal recall techniques on children's memory accounts.
    Teoh YS; Chang TF
    Scand J Psychol; 2018 Dec; 59(6):631-633. PubMed ID: 30295329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Believing is seeing: how rumors can engender false memories in preschoolers.
    Principe GF; Kanaya T; Ceci SJ; Singh M
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Mar; 17(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 16507065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Effect of interview techniques on children's eyewitness reports and subsequent memories of a viewed event].
    Naka M
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2012 Oct; 83(4):303-13. PubMed ID: 23214079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Narrative elaboration: test of a new procedure for interviewing children.
    Saywitz KJ; Snyder L
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1996 Dec; 64(6):1347-57. PubMed ID: 8991321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Training children in event recall: benefits of a brief narrative elaboration training].
    Roebers CM; Beuscher E
    Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 2004 Dec; 53(10):707-21. PubMed ID: 15646018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The NICHD investigative interview protocol: an analogue study.
    Brown DA; Lamb ME; Lewis C; Pipe ME; Orbach Y; Wolfman M
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Dec; 19(4):367-82. PubMed ID: 24341318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence supporting restrictions on uses of body diagrams in forensic interviews.
    Poole DA; Dickinson JJ
    Child Abuse Negl; 2011 Sep; 35(9):659-69. PubMed ID: 21940047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hypnotic interviewing: the best way to interview eyewitnesses?
    Kebbell MR; Wagstaff GF
    Behav Sci Law; 1998; 16(1):115-29. PubMed ID: 9549881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship between interview characteristics and accuracy of recall in young children: do individual differences matter?
    Geddie LF; Beer J; Bartosik S; Wuensch KL
    Child Maltreat; 2001 Feb; 6(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 11217171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles.
    Vrij A; Mann S; Kristen S; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Oct; 31(5):499-518. PubMed ID: 17211691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Facilitating children's eyewitness recall with the revised cognitive interview.
    McCauley MR; Fisher RP
    J Appl Psychol; 1995 Aug; 80(4):510-6. PubMed ID: 7642461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Returning to the scene: reminders and context reinstatement enhance children's recall.
    Priestley G; Roberts S; Pipe ME
    Dev Psychol; 1999 Jul; 35(4):1006-19. PubMed ID: 10442869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The development of differential mnemonic effects of false denials and forced confabulations.
    Otgaar H; Howe ML; Memon A; Wang J
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):718-31. PubMed ID: 25418787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of intellectual disability on children's recall of an event across different question types.
    Agnew SE; Powell MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Jun; 28(3):273-94. PubMed ID: 15264447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Low-SES children's eyewitness memory: the effects of verbal labels and vocabulary skills.
    Chae Y; Kulkofsky S; Debaran F; Wang Q; Hart SL
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):732-45. PubMed ID: 25393768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.