160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11277042)
1. Psychosis and punishment. Should the mentally ill be drugged so they can face execution?
Szegedy-Maszak M
US News World Rep; 2001 Mar; 130(12):50-1. PubMed ID: 11277042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Of pills and needs: involuntarily medicating the psychotic inmate when execution looms.
Cantor JD
Indiana Health Law Rev; 2005; 2(1):117-70. PubMed ID: 17111502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Seeking an answer: questioning the validity of forcible medication to ensure mental competency of those condemned to die.
Stricker BW
McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 32(1):317-40. PubMed ID: 15709265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Perry v. Louisiana: can a state treat an incompetent prisoner to ready him for execution?
Evans GL
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(3):249-70. PubMed ID: 1777688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. "Mind control," "synthetic sanity," "artificial competence," and genuine confusion: legally relevant effects of antipsychotic medication.
Gutheil TG; Appelbaum PS
Hofstra Law Rev; 1983; 12(1):77-120. PubMed ID: 15739272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Restored to health to be put to death: reconciling the legal and ethical dilemmas of medicating to execute in Singleton v. Norris.
Hensl KB
Villanova Law Rev; 2004; 49(2):291-328. PubMed ID: 16485377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cruelty to the mentally ill: an Eighth Amendment challenge to the abolition of the insanity defense.
LeBlanc SM
Am Univ Law Rev; 2007 Jun; 56(5):1281-328. PubMed ID: 17632959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychiatric advance directives.
Halpern AL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):571-2. PubMed ID: 17185490
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Denouement of an execution competency case: is Perry pyrrhic?
Mossman D
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1995; 23(2):269-84. PubMed ID: 8605411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exploring ethical, legal, and professional issues with the mentally ill on death row.
Plichta JE
J Forensic Nurs; 2008; 4(3):143-6. PubMed ID: 18798882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. State can make inmate sane enough to execute.
Liptak A
N Y Times Web; 2003 Feb; ():A1, A27. PubMed ID: 12812158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. "Synthetic sanity": the ethics and legality of using psychotropic medications to render death row inmates competent for execution.
Daugherty KM
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2001; 17(2):715-35. PubMed ID: 11475573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Justices let stand ruling that allows forcibly drugging an inmate before execution.
Lewis NA
N Y Times Web; 2003 Oct; ():A16. PubMed ID: 14610765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Mental retardation and the death penalty: current status of exemption legislation.
Keyes DW; Edwards WJ
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1997; 21(5):687-96. PubMed ID: 9385803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Sell v. U.S.: involuntary treatment case or catalyst for change?
Leong GB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):292-4. PubMed ID: 16186189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Mentally ill persons who commit crimes: punishment or treatment?
Melamed Y
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(1):100-3. PubMed ID: 20305082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Forcible medication: a new insanity defence.
Economist; 2003 Mar; 366(8313):31. PubMed ID: 15022679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Sell v. United States: the appropriate standard for involuntarily administering antipsychotic drugs to dangerous detainees for trial.
Borger BA
Seton Hall Law Rev; 2005; 35(3):1099-120. PubMed ID: 16270457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Role of psychiatrists in capital punishment cases : a review].
Nakajima N
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2002; 104(3):229-40. PubMed ID: 11985117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Competency to stand trial and the seriousness of the charge.
Buchanan A
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):458-65. PubMed ID: 17185474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
