These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11277222)

  • 1. Determination of absorbed dose calibration factors for therapy level electron beam ionization chambers.
    McEwen MR; Williams AJ; DuSautoy AR
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Mar; 46(3):741-55. PubMed ID: 11277222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The characterization of the Advanced Markus ionization chamber for use in reference electron dosimetry in the UK.
    Pearce J; Thomas R; Dusautoy A
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(3):473-83. PubMed ID: 16424576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The IPEM code of practice for electron dosimetry for radiotherapy beams of initial energy from 4 to 25 MeV based on an absorbed dose to water calibration.
    Thwaites DI; DuSautoy AR; Jordan T; McEwen MR; Nisbet A; Nahum AE; Pitchford WG;
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 48(18):2929-70. PubMed ID: 14529204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Polarity and ion recombination correction factors for ionization chambers employed in electron beam dosimetry.
    Nisbet A; Thwaites DI
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Feb; 43(2):435-43. PubMed ID: 9509537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A dosimetry study comparing NCS report-5, IAEA TRS-381, AAPM TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 in three clinical electron beam energies.
    Palmans H; Nafaa L; de Patoul N; Denis JM; Tomsej M; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 May; 48(9):1091-107. PubMed ID: 12765324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The calibration of parallel-plate electron ionization chambers at NPL for use with the IPEM 2003 code of practice: summary data.
    Bass G; Thomas R; Pearce J
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(8):N115-24. PubMed ID: 19305037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ionization chamber dosimetry of proton beams using cylindrical and plane parallel chambers. Nw versus Nk ion chamber calibrations.
    Medin J; Andreo P; Grusell E; Mattsson O; Montelius A; Roos M
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 Jul; 40(7):1161-76. PubMed ID: 7568375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
    Tailor RC; Hanson WF
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An experimental evaluation of recent electron dosimetry codes of practice.
    Nisbet A; Thwaites DI; Nahum AE; Pitchford WG
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Aug; 43(8):1999-2014. PubMed ID: 9725585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Polarity effect of plane-parallel ionization chambers in electron radiation.
    Havercroft JM; Klevenhagen SC
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Feb; 39(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 15552127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Air kerma calibration factors and chamber correction values for PTW soft x-ray, NACP and Roos ionization chambers at very low x-ray energies.
    Ipe NE; Rosser KE; Moretti CJ; Manning JW; Palmer MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Aug; 46(8):2107-17. PubMed ID: 11512614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct measurement of electron beam quality conversion factors using water calorimetry.
    Renaud J; Sarfehnia A; Marchant K; McEwen M; Ross C; Seuntjens J
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6357-68. PubMed ID: 26520727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The calibration of therapy level electron beam ionization chambers in terms of absorbed dose to water.
    McEwen MR; DuSautoy AR; Williams AJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Sep; 43(9):2503-19. PubMed ID: 9755942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An experimental study of recombination and polarity effect in a set of customized plane parallel ionization chambers.
    Kron T; McNiven A; Witruk B; Kenny M; Battista J
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2006 Dec; 29(4):291-9. PubMed ID: 17260582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international codes of practice. International Atomic Energy Agency.
    Andreo P; Huq MS; Westermark M; Song H; Tilikidis A; DeWerd L; Shortt K
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3033-53. PubMed ID: 12361209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electron beam water calorimetry measurements to obtain beam quality conversion factors.
    Muir BR; Cojocaru CD; McEwen MR; Ross CK
    Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5433-5444. PubMed ID: 28688120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An investigation of the response of a simple design of plane-parallel chamber.
    Ma CM; Knight RT; Nahum AE; Mayles WP
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Oct; 39(10):1593-608. PubMed ID: 15551533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Possibility of using cylindrical ionization chambers for percent depth-dose measurements in clinical electron beams.
    Ono T; Araki F; Yoshiyama F
    Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4647-54. PubMed ID: 21928637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.