These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11277451)

  • 1. Coloring single stroop elements: reducing automaticity or slowing color processing?
    Monahan JS
    J Gen Psychol; 2001 Jan; 128(1):98-112. PubMed ID: 11277451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coloring only a single letter does not eliminate color-word interference in a vocal-response Stroop task: automaticity revealed.
    Marmurek HH
    J Gen Psychol; 2003 Apr; 130(2):207-24. PubMed ID: 12773021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automaticity in reading and the Stroop task: testing the limits of involuntary word processing.
    Brown TL; Joneleit K; Robinson CS; Brown CR
    Am J Psychol; 2002; 115(4):515-43. PubMed ID: 12516527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Priming and interference effects can be dissociated in the Stroop task: new evidence in favor of the automaticity of word recognition.
    Catena A; Fuentes LJ; Tudela P
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Mar; 9(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 12026942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cognitive control in children: stroop interference and suppression of word reading.
    Bub DN; Masson ME; Lalonde CE
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Apr; 17(4):351-7. PubMed ID: 16623694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Verbal coding and the elimination of Stroop interference in a matching task.
    Mascolo MF; Hirtle SC
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(2):195-215. PubMed ID: 2349976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attention and facilitation: converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 20192539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A rational look at the emotional stroop phenomenon: a generic slowdown, not a stroop effect.
    Algom D; Chajut E; Lev S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Sep; 133(3):323-38. PubMed ID: 15355142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The automaticity of emotional Stroop: a meta-analysis.
    Phaf RH; Kan KJ
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2007 Jun; 38(2):184-99. PubMed ID: 17112461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of color word availability on the Stroop color-naming effect.
    Kim H; Cho YS; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1540-51. PubMed ID: 19064496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Stroop-like effect in color-naming of color-word lexigrams by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodyte).
    Beran MJ; Washburn DA; Rumbaugh DM
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Apr; 134(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 17503696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Stroop effect for spatial orientation.
    Wühr P
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Jul; 134(3):285-94. PubMed ID: 17824399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stroop effects in persons with traumatic brain injury: selective attention, speed of processing, or color-naming? A meta-analysis.
    Ben-David BM; Nguyen LL; van Lieshout PH
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2011 Mar; 17(2):354-63. PubMed ID: 21320377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stroop dilution depends on the nature of the color carrier but not on its location.
    Cho YS; Lien MC; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):826-39. PubMed ID: 16846282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stroop interference and negative priming: problems with inferences from null results.
    Marí-Beffa P; Estévez AF; Danziger S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):499-503. PubMed ID: 11082856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words.
    Dunbar K; MacLeod CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Oct; 10(5):622-39. PubMed ID: 6238123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Single-letter coloring and spatial cuing do not eliminate or reduce a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.
    Augustinova M; Flaudias V; Ferrand L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Dec; 17(6):827-33. PubMed ID: 21169576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Color-Word Stroop test performance across the adult life span.
    Uttl B; Graf P
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1997 Jun; 19(3):405-20. PubMed ID: 9268815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Likelihood of attending to the color word modulates Stroop interference.
    Cho YS; Choi JM; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):416-29. PubMed ID: 22147533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Aging and cognitive slowing: example of attentional processes--evaluation procedures and related questions].
    Eusop E; Sebban C; Piette F
    Encephale; 2001; 27(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 11294037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.