These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1127901)

  • 1. Measuring in-the-ear gain of hearing aids by the acoustic reflex method.
    Tonisson W
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Mar; 18(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 1127901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individualized correction factors in the preselection of hearing aids.
    Fikret-Pasa S; Revit LJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Apr; 35(2):384-400. PubMed ID: 1573878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of hearing-aid gain using functional, coupler, and probe-tube measurements.
    Mason D; Popelka GR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):218-26. PubMed ID: 3724114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hearing aid validation based on 40 Hz auditory steady-state response thresholds.
    Sardari S; Jafari Z; Haghani H; Talebi H
    Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):134-41. PubMed ID: 26385486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Coupler-related real ear gain. Interaction between subject and hearing aid type.
    Berninger E; Ovegård A; Svärd I
    Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 1585125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Verification of in situ thresholds and integrated real-ear measurements.
    Digiovanni JJ; Pratt RM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(10):663-70. PubMed ID: 21376007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An alternate method for determining functional gain of hearing aids.
    Rines D; Stelmachowicz PG; Gorga MP
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Dec; 27(4):627-33. PubMed ID: 6521471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the Repeatability and Accuracy of the Wideband Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference.
    Vaisberg JM; Folkeard P; Pumford J; Narten P; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jun; 29(6):520-532. PubMed ID: 29863466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Open earmold fittings for improving aided auditory localization for sensorineural hearing losses with good high-frequency hearing.
    Byrne D; Sinclair S; Noble W
    Ear Hear; 1998 Feb; 19(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 9504273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring the real-ear to coupler difference transfer function with an insert earphone and a hearing instrument: are they the same?
    Munro KJ; Toal S
    Ear Hear; 2005 Feb; 26(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 15692302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probe-determined hearing-aid gain compared to functional and coupler gains.
    Zemplenyi J; Dirks D; Gilman S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Sep; 28(3):394-404. PubMed ID: 4046580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Audiometric earphone discomfort level and hearing aid saturation sound pressure level for a 90 decibel input signal (SSPL90) as measured in the human ear canal.
    Leijon A; Harford E; Lidén G; Ringdahl A; Dahlberg AK
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(4):185-9. PubMed ID: 6618037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Test-retest reliability of in situ unaided thresholds in adults.
    Smith-Olinde L; Nicholson N; Chivers C; Highley P; Williams DK
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 15(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 16803794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Probe-tube microphone measures with very young infants: real ear to coupler differences and longitudinal changes in real ear unaided response.
    Westwood GF; Bamford JM
    Ear Hear; 1995 Jun; 16(3):263-73. PubMed ID: 7672475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Test-retest reliability of probe-microphone verification in children fitted with open and closed hearing aid tips.
    Kim H; Ricketts TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):635-42. PubMed ID: 24047950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency responses of hearing aids and their effects on the speech perception of hearing-impaired subjects.
    Pascoe DP
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1975; 84(5 pt 2 Suppl 23):1-40. PubMed ID: 1180471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy and reliability of a real-ear-to-coupler difference measurement procedure implemented within a behind-the-ear hearing aid.
    Scollie S; Bagatto M; Moodie S; Crukley J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):612-622. PubMed ID: 22192606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acoustic reflex threshold measurement in hearing aid selection.
    Rappaport BZ; Tait CA
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1976 Mar; 102(3):129-32. PubMed ID: 1267684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relative accuracy of coupler and behavioural estimates of the real ear gain of a hearing aid.
    Green R
    Br J Audiol; 1988 Feb; 22(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 3365522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech understanding and directional hearing for hearing-impaired subjects with in-the-ear and behind-the-ear hearing aids.
    Leeuw AR; Dreschler WA
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 3589478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.