These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1127901)

  • 21. Examination of two issues concerning functional gain measurements.
    Hawkins DB; Montgomery AA; Prosek RA; Walden BE
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1987 Feb; 52(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 3807346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Threshold improvement and acoustic gain with hearing aids.
    Walden BE; Kasten RN
    Audiology; 1976; 15(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 938347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of reference microphone location and loudspeaker azimuth on probe tube microphone measurements.
    Ickes MA; Hawkins DB; Cooper WA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1991 Jul; 2(3):156-63. PubMed ID: 1768884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Relative loudness perception of low and high frequency sounds in the open and occluded ear.
    Keidser G; Katsch R; Dillon H; Grant F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jun; 107(6):3351-7. PubMed ID: 10875380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Maximum real-ear gain of in-the-ear hearing aids.
    Erickson FN; Van Tasell DJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):351-9. PubMed ID: 2046359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Probe microphone measurements: 20 years of progress.
    Mueller HG
    Trends Amplif; 2001 Jun; 5(2):35-68. PubMed ID: 25425897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hearing aid prescription rules using insertion gain measurements.
    Ringdahl A; Leijon A; Lidén G; Backelin L
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(4):211-8. PubMed ID: 6523039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In-situ Audiometry Compared to Conventional Audiometry for Hearing Aid Fitting.
    Van Eeckhoutte M; Jasper BS; Kjærbøl EF; Jordell DH; Dau T
    Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241259704. PubMed ID: 38835268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Aided and unaided narrow band noise thresholds in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment.
    Garstecki DC; Bode DL
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 1(6):258-62. PubMed ID: 931761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Temporary threshold shift caused by hearing aid use.
    Macrae JH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Apr; 36(2):365-72. PubMed ID: 8487528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact on hearing aid targets of measuring thresholds in dB HL versus dB SPL.
    Saunders GH; Morgan DE
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Sep; 42(6):319-26. PubMed ID: 14570239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fitting range of the BAHA Intenso.
    Bosman AJ; Snik FM; Mylanus EA; Cremers WR
    Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(6):346-52. PubMed ID: 19925342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prediction of aided and unaided audiograms using sound-field auditory steady-state evoked responses.
    Shemesh R; Attias J; Magdoub H; Nageris BI
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Oct; 51(10):746-53. PubMed ID: 22924851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Relationship of acoustic gain to aided threshold improvement in children.
    Jirsa RE; Norris TW
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1978 Aug; 43(3):348-52. PubMed ID: 692100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of tubing length and coupling method on hearing threshold and real-ear to coupler difference measures.
    Gustafson S; Pittman A; Fanning R
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):190-9. PubMed ID: 23800818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Signal delivery/real ear measurement system for hearing aid selection and fitting.
    Zelisko DL; Seewald RC; Gagné JP
    Ear Hear; 1992 Dec; 13(6):460-3. PubMed ID: 1342584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of twelve methods for estimating the real ear gain of hearing aids.
    Dillon H; Murray N
    Ear Hear; 1987 Feb; 8(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 3556806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Maturation of the occlusion effect: a bone conduction auditory steady state response study in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Small SA; Hu N
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):708-19. PubMed ID: 21617531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.