626 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11280365)
1. Rehabilitation of patients with severely resorbed maxillae by means of implants with or without bone grafts: a 3- to 5-year follow-up clinical report.
Widmark G; Andersson B; Carlsson GE; Lindvall AM; Ivanoff CJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 11280365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rehabilitation of patients with severely resorbed maxillae by means of implants with or without bone grafts. A 1-year follow-up study.
Widmark G; Andersson B; Andrup B; Carlsson GE; Ivanoff CJ; Lindvall AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(4):474-82. PubMed ID: 9714953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implant treatment in edentulous maxillae: a 5-year follow-up report on patients with different degrees of jaw resorption.
Jemt T; Lekholm U
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 7615326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective study of treatment of severely resorbed maxillae with narrow nonsubmerged implants: results after 1 year of loading.
Hallman M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):731-6. PubMed ID: 11669256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implants and sinus-inlay graft in a 1-stage procedure in severely atrophied maxillae: prosthodontic aspects in a 3-year follow-up study.
Smedberg JI; Johansson P; Ekenbäck D; Wannfors D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11669249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of mandibular dentition on implant failures in bone-grafted edentulous maxillae.
Becktor JP; Eckert SE; Isaksson S; Keller EE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 11858576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survival analysis of endosseous implants in grafted and nongrafted edentulous maxillae.
Becktor JP; Isaksson S; Sennerby L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 14982363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implant treatment in the edentulous maxillae: a 15-year follow-up study on 76 consecutive patients provided with fixed prostheses.
Jemt T; Johansson J
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(2):61-9. PubMed ID: 16774591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with dental implants in the augmented maxillary sinus: a 5-year clinical investigation.
Hürzeler MB; Kirsch A; Ackermann KL; Quiñones CR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):466-75. PubMed ID: 8803342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implant rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla including immediate fixed provisional restoration without the use of bone grafting: a review of 1-year outcome data from a long-term prospective clinical trial.
Toljanic JA; Baer RA; Ekstrand K; Thor A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):518-26. PubMed ID: 19587876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Severely resorbed mandible treated with iliac crest autogenous bone graft and dental implants: 17-year follow-up.
Moses O; Nemcovsky CE; Langer Y; Tal H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):1017-21. PubMed ID: 18271386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Immediate functional loading of TiOblast dental implants in full-arch edentulous maxillae: a 3-year prospective study.
Collaert B; De Bruyn H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1254-60. PubMed ID: 19040440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implant reconstruction of the bone-grafted maxilla: review of the literature and presentation of 8 cases.
Clayman L
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Apr; 64(4):674-82. PubMed ID: 16546648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Immediate loading of dental implants placed in revascularized fibula free flaps: a clinical report on 2 consecutive patients.
Chiapasco M; Gatti C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):906-12. PubMed ID: 15623070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implants and sinus-inlay bone grafts in a 1-stage procedure on severely atrophied maxillae: surgical aspects of a 3-year follow-up study.
Johansson B; Wannfors K; Ekenbäck J; Smedberg JI; Hirsch J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(6):811-8. PubMed ID: 10612917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A long-term retrospective study of two different implant surfaces placed after reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla using Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting.
Marchetti C; Pieri F; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 19014162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rehabilitation of the resorbed maxilla and mandible using autogenous bone grafts and osseointegrated implants.
Williamson RA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):476-88. PubMed ID: 8803343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The nasopalatine canal as an anatomic buttress for implant placement in the severely atrophic maxilla: a pilot study.
Peñarrocha M; Carrillo C; Uribe R; García B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):936-42. PubMed ID: 19865635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early complete failures of fixed implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla: a 3-year analysis of 17 consecutive cluster failure patients.
Jemt T; Häger P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(2):77-86. PubMed ID: 16774593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endosseous implants and bone augmentation in the partially dentate maxilla: an analysis of 17 patients with a follow-up of 29 to 101 months.
Becktor JP; Isaksson S; Sennerby L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):603-8. PubMed ID: 17929521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
