316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11280428)
21. Do qualifiers of ASCUS distinguish between low- and high-risk patients?
Malik SN; Wilkinson EJ; Drew PA; Bennett BB; Hardt NS
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(3):376-80. PubMed ID: 10349365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Colposcopic and histologic findings in women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Yarandi F; Izadi Mood N; Mirashrafi F; Eftekhar Z
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 15598287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Screening properties of human papillomavirus testing for predicting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion smears: a prospective study.
Dane C; Batmaz G; Dane B; Cetin A
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2009 Apr; 13(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 19302953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Significance of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance on ThinPrep papanicolaou smears.
Eltabbakh GH; Lipman JN; Mount SL; Morgan A
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Oct; 79(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11006029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Significance of extensive hyperkeratosis on cervical/vaginal smears.
Williamson BA; DeFrias D; Gunn R; Tarjan G; Nayar R
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(5):749-52. PubMed ID: 14526673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. ASCUS on cervical cytologic smears. Clinical significance.
Yang M; Zachariah S
J Reprod Med; 1997 Jun; 42(6):329-31. PubMed ID: 9219118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The role of human papillomavirus type 16/18 genotyping in predicting high-grade cervical/vaginal intraepithelial neoplasm in women with mildly abnormal Papanicolaou results.
Guo M; Gong Y; Wang J; Dawlett M; Patel S; Liu P; Bevers TB; Sneige N
Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Feb; 121(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 23225501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Evaluation of cytological screening for cancers and precancerous lesions of the cervix].
Boman F; Duhamel A; Trinh QD; Deken V; Leroy JL; Beuscart R
Bull Cancer; 2003 Jul; 90(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 12957806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Managing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in Papanicolaou smears.
Morin C; Bairati I; Bouchard C; Fortier M; Roy M; Moore L; Meisels A
J Reprod Med; 2001 Sep; 46(9):799-805. PubMed ID: 11584480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of cytologic screening results of the cervix.
Yalti S; Gürbüz B; Bilgiç R; Cakar Y; Eren S
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2005; 15(2):292-4. PubMed ID: 15823114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reducing or eliminating use of the category of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance decreases the diagnostic accuracy of the Papanicolaou smear.
Pitman MB; Cibas ES; Powers CN; Renshaw AA; Frable WJ
Cancer; 2002 Jun; 96(3):128-34. PubMed ID: 12115299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Oral contraceptive pills are associated with artifacts in ThinPrep Pap smears that mimic low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Morrison C; Prokorym P; Piquero C; Wakely PE; Nuovo GJ
Cancer; 2003 Apr; 99(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 12704686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Whole-Slide Imaging of Pap Cellblock Preparations Is a Potentially Valid Screening Method.
Tawfik O; Davis M; Dillon S; Tawfik L; Diaz FJ; Amin K; Fan F
Acta Cytol; 2015; 59(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 25967603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Is the human papillomavirus test in combination with the Papanicolaou test useful for management of patients with diagnoses of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions?
Lee NW; Kim D; Park JT; Kim A
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2001 Nov; 125(11):1453-7. PubMed ID: 11698001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Interobserver variability: comparison between liquid-based and conventional preparations in gynecologic cytology.
Chhieng DC; Talley LI; Roberson J; Gatscha RM; Jhala NC; Elgert PA
Cancer; 2002 Apr; 96(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 11954023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Patients with negative cervical biopsies after papanicolaou test interpretations of "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion": comparative longitudinal follow-up.
Huitron S; Bonvicino A; Fadare O
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2008 Jun; 12(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 18486894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Triage of women with ASCUS and LSIL on Pap smear reports: management by repeat Pap smear, HPV DNA testing, or colposcopy?
Ferris DG; Wright TC; Litaker MS; Richart RM; Lorincz AT; Sun XW; Borgatta L; Buck H; Kramer L; Rubin R
J Fam Pract; 1998 Feb; 46(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 9487318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Results of pap smears and immunocytochemical detection of the p16 and Ki67 proteins in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer].
Rokita W; Skawiński D; Zmelonek-Znamirowska A; Kedzia W; Karowicz-Bilińska A; Spaczyński R; Spaczyński M
Ginekol Pol; 2012 Nov; 83(11):822-6. PubMed ID: 23379189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Significance of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA detection in women 50 years and older with squamous cell papanicolaou test abnormalities.
Zhao C; Zhao S; Heider A; Austin RM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Aug; 134(8):1130-5. PubMed ID: 20670132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Distribution of human papillomavirus types in ThinPrep Papanicolaou tests classified according to the Bethesda 2001 terminology and correlations with patient age and biopsy outcomes.
Evans MF; Adamson CS; Papillo JL; St John TL; Leiman G; Cooper K
Cancer; 2006 Mar; 106(5):1054-64. PubMed ID: 16421920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
