295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11280635)
41. Hypertonic-hyperoncotic solutions improve cardiac function in children after open-heart surgery.
Schroth M; Plank C; Meissner U; Eberle KP; Weyand M; Cesnjevar R; Dötsch J; Rascher W
Pediatrics; 2006 Jul; 118(1):e76-84. PubMed ID: 16751617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparison of pulse pressure variation versus echocardiography-derived stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated anesthetized dogs.
Gonçalves LA; Otsuki DA; Pereira MA; Nagashima JK; Ambrosio AM; Fantoni DT
Vet Anaesth Analg; 2020 Jan; 47(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 31822378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Identification of volume parameters monitored with a noninvasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor for predicting fluid responsiveness in children after congenital heart disease surgery.
Cheng YW; Xu F; Li J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Sep; 97(39):e12289. PubMed ID: 30278500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Changes in stroke volume induced by passive leg raising in spontaneously breathing patients: comparison between echocardiography and Vigileo/FloTrac device.
Biais M; Vidil L; Sarrabay P; Cottenceau V; Revel P; Sztark F
Crit Care; 2009; 13(6):R195. PubMed ID: 19968880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Right ventricular end-diastolic volume as a predictor of the hemodynamic response to a fluid challenge.
Wagner JG; Leatherman JW
Chest; 1998 Apr; 113(4):1048-54. PubMed ID: 9554646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Variability in the Physiologic Response to Fluid Bolus in Pediatric Patients Following Cardiac Surgery.
Ranjit S; Natraj R; Kissoon N; Thiagarajan R; Ramakrishnan B; García MIM
Crit Care Med; 2020 Nov; 48(11):e1062-e1070. PubMed ID: 32947469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Intraoperative validation of mitral inflow determination by transesophageal echocardiography: comparison of single-plane, biplane and thermodilution techniques.
Pu M; Griffin BP; Vandervoort PM; Leung DY; Cosgrove DM; Thomas JD
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 Oct; 26(4):1047-53. PubMed ID: 7560598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure.
Huang CC; Fu JY; Hu HC; Kao KC; Chen NH; Hsieh MJ; Tsai YH
Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2810-6. PubMed ID: 18766099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [Clinical observation of non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor combined passive leg raising test in predicting the children volume responsiveness].
Wu Y; Liu X; Li C; He Y; Yang W; Yang Y; Ma W; Fu K
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2014 Jan; 26(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 24506855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Transoesophageal Doppler compared to central venous pressure for perioperative hemodynamic monitoring and fluid guidance in liver resection.
El Sharkawy OA; Refaat EK; Ibraheem AE; Mahdy WR; Fayed NA; Mourad WS; Abd Elhafez HS; Yassen KA
Saudi J Anaesth; 2013 Oct; 7(4):378-86. PubMed ID: 24348287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Clinical validation of cardiac output measurements using femoral artery thermodilution with direct Fick in ventilated children and infants.
Tibby SM; Hatherill M; Marsh MJ; Morrison G; Anderson D; Murdoch IA
Intensive Care Med; 1997 Sep; 23(9):987-91. PubMed ID: 9347372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Relative value of pressures and volumes in assessing fluid responsiveness after valvular and coronary artery surgery.
Breukers RM; Trof RJ; de Wilde RB; van den Berg PC; Twisk JW; Jansen JR; Groeneveld J
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 18835782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Stroke volume optimization in elective bowel surgery: a comparison between pulse power wave analysis (LiDCOrapid) and oesophageal Doppler (CardioQ).
Nordström J; Hällsjö-Sander C; Shore R; Björne H
Br J Anaesth; 2013 Mar; 110(3):374-80. PubMed ID: 23171725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients during cardiac surgery.
Rex S; Brose S; Metzelder S; Hüneke R; Schälte G; Autschbach R; Rossaint R; Buhre W
Br J Anaesth; 2004 Dec; 93(6):782-8. PubMed ID: 15465840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Arm occlusion pressure is a useful predictor of an increase in cardiac output after fluid loading following cardiac surgery.
Geerts BF; Maas J; de Wilde RB; Aarts LP; Jansen JR
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Nov; 28(11):802-6. PubMed ID: 21799416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Evaluation of pulse pressure variation and pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated isoflurane-anesthetized dogs.
Sano H; Seo J; Wightman P; Cave NJ; Gieseg MA; Johnson CB; Chambers P
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2018 Jul; 28(4):301-309. PubMed ID: 29898246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Dynamic and volumetric variables of fluid responsiveness fail during immediate postresuscitation period.
Gruenewald M; Meybohm P; Koerner S; Renner J; Maracke M; Schrezenmeir J; Steinfath M; Bein B
Crit Care Med; 2011 Aug; 39(8):1953-9. PubMed ID: 21532471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Evaluation of the ability of haemodynamic variables obtained with minimally invasive techniques to assess fluid responsiveness in endotoxaemic Beagles.
Muehlestein MB; Steblaj B; Joerger FB; Briganti A; Kutter APN
Vet Anaesth Analg; 2021 Sep; 48(5):645-653. PubMed ID: 34334294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparing Methods for Cardiac Output: Intraoperatively Doppler-Derived Cardiac Output Measured With 3-Dimensional Echocardiography Is Not Interchangeable With Cardiac Output by Pulmonary Catheter Thermodilution.
Graeser K; Zemtsovski M; Kofoed KF; Winther-Jensen M; Nilsson JC; Kjaergaard J; Møller-Sørensen H
Anesth Analg; 2018 Aug; 127(2):399-407. PubMed ID: 29324489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Noninvasive stroke volume variation using electrical velocimetry for predicting fluid responsiveness in dogs undergoing cardiac surgery.
Sasaki K; Mutoh T; Mutoh T; Taki Y; Kawashima R
Vet Anaesth Analg; 2017 Jul; 44(4):719-726. PubMed ID: 28803717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
