These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11281004)
1. Belling the cat: clinical investigation in vulnerable populations (a good idea, but who's going to volunteer?). Legato MJ J Gend Specif Med; 1998; 1(2):12-3. PubMed ID: 11281004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. There is no women's health crisis. Satel SL Public Interest; 1998; 130():21-33. PubMed ID: 11658109 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. How did the male become the normative standard for clinical drug trials? Scott JW Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 11653142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. HIV, women, and access to clinical trials: tort liability and lessons from DES. Mastroianni AC Duke J Gend Law Policy; 1998; 5(1):167-91. PubMed ID: 11979601 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Sex & gender: the politics, policy, and practice of medical research. Keitt SK Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2003; 3(2):253-78. PubMed ID: 14577143 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A drug company report: what is the same and what is changing with respect to inclusion/exclusion of women in clinical trials. Goldmann BJ Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 11653139 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Participation of women in clinical trials of drug therapies: a context for the controversies. Prout MN; Fish SS Medscape Womens Health; 2001 Oct; 6(5):1. PubMed ID: 11698923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Women not shortchanged in trials? Holden C Science; 1997 Mar; 275(5306):1571-3. PubMed ID: 11644903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical gender bias and managed care. MacDougall VL Oklahoma City Univ Law Rev; 2002; 27(3):781-910. PubMed ID: 15478255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical trials: keeping score on the sexes. Marshall E Science; 2005 Jun; 308(5728):1571. PubMed ID: 15947168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The sex-bias myth in medicine. Kadar AG Atl Mon; 1994 Aug; 274(2):66-70. PubMed ID: 11659876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Does exclusion or inclusion better protect women? Shultz MM J Gend Specif Med; 1998; 1(2):18-22. PubMed ID: 11281007 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The invisible woman: gender bias in medical research. Keville TD Womens Rights Law Report; 1994; 15():123-42. PubMed ID: 11660409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Off the pedestal and into the arena: toward including women in experimental protocols. Gorenberg H; White A Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(1):205-46. PubMed ID: 11659599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Conducting health research with vulnerable women: issues and strategies. Heaman M Can J Nurs Res; 2001 Dec; 33(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 11845625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A feminist challenge to practices of medicine. Wallace KA J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11644538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Women abound in NIH trials. Holden C Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):219. PubMed ID: 18845746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Report from the field: participation of HIV-positive women in clinical research. Williams AB; Singh MP; Dos Santos K; Winfrey J; Mezger J AIDS Public Policy J; 1997; 12(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 10915256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Minority recruitment and participation in health research. Corbie-Smith GM N C Med J; 2004; 65(6):385-7. PubMed ID: 15714732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]