BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11281497)

  • 1. Sonographic morphology scores (SMS) for differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian tumor.
    Wanapirak C; Nimitwongsakul S; Tongsong T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Jan; 84(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11281497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sonographic morphology scores (SMS) for differentiation between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Wanapirak C; Srisupundit K; Tongsong T
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2006; 7(3):407-10. PubMed ID: 17059332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subjective sonographic assessment for differentiation between malignant and benign adnexal masses.
    Tongsong T; Wanapirak C; Sukpan K; Khunamornpong S; Pathumbal A
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2007; 8(1):124-6. PubMed ID: 17477786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the five sonographic morphology scoring systems for the diagnosis of malignant ovarian tumors.
    Klangsin S; Suntharasaj T; Suwanrath C; Kor-Anantakul O; Prasartwanakit V
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 76(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 24192793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sonographic morphological pattern in the pre-operative prediction of ovarian masses.
    Benjapibal M; Sunsaneevitayakul P; Phatihattakorn C; Suphanit I; Iamurairat W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 Apr; 86(4):332-7. PubMed ID: 12757077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New sonographic morphology score for the differentiation of malignant from benign ovarian tumors.
    Shen ZY; He AQ; Xia GL; Wu MF; Li J; Ding YS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1000-12. PubMed ID: 27125323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound help in discrimination between benign and malignant ovarian masses?
    Jokubkiene L; Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 29(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 17201017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Diagnostic importance of the sonographic scoring system in differentiating between malignant and benign ovarian tumors].
    Durdević S
    Med Pregl; 2001; 54(3-4):161-5. PubMed ID: 11759208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Color Doppler ultrasonography for prediction of malignant ovarian tumors.
    Benjapibal M; Sunsaneevitayakul P; Boriboonhirunsarn D; Sutanthavibul A; Chakorngowit M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2002 Jun; 85(6):709-15. PubMed ID: 12322845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benign and malignant ovarian masses: selection of the most discriminating gray-scale and Doppler sonographic features.
    Brown DL; Doubilet PM; Miller FH; Frates MC; Laing FC; DiSalvo DN; Benson CB; Lerner MH
    Radiology; 1998 Jul; 208(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 9646799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new sonomorphologic scoring system (Mainz Score) for the assessment of ovarian tumors using transvaginal ultrasonography. Part I: A comparison between the scoring-system and the assessment by an experienced sonographer.
    Merz E; Weber G; Bahlmann F; Kiesslich R
    Ultraschall Med; 1998 Jun; 19(3):99-107. PubMed ID: 9744040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new sonomorphologic scoring-system (Mainz score) for the assessment of ovarian tumors using transvaginal ultrasonography. Part II: A comparison between the scoring-system and the assessment by an experienced sonographer in postmenopausal women.
    Weber G; Merz E; Bahlmann F; Leber AM
    Ultraschall Med; 1999 Feb; 20(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 10226339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. E-flow doppler indices for prediction of benign and malignant ovarian tumors.
    Tongsong T; Wanapirak C; Neeyalavira V; Khunamornpong S; Sukpan K
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2009; 10(1):139-42. PubMed ID: 19469642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses: comparison of five scoring systems in a multicenter study.
    Ferrazzi E; Zanetta G; Dordoni D; Berlanda N; Mezzopane R; Lissoni AA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 10(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 9339526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Power Doppler vascularity index for predicting malignancy of adnexal masses.
    Marret H; Sauget S; Giraudeau B; Body G; Tranquart F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 25(5):508-13. PubMed ID: 15846763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of ultrasound score, CA125, menopausal status, and risk of malignancy index in differentiating between benign and borderline or malignant ovarian tumors.
    Leelahakorn S; Tangjitgamol S; Manusirivithaya S; Thongsuksai P; Jaroenchainon P; Jivangkul C
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88 Suppl 2():S22-30. PubMed ID: 17718292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian tumours by ultrasonography.
    Tuladhar AS; Pradhan S
    Nepal Med Coll J; 2005 Dec; 7(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 16519078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between sonographic morphology and Doppler waveform for the diagnosis of ovarian malignancy.
    Bromley B; Goodman H; Benacerraf BR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Mar; 83(3):434-7. PubMed ID: 8127538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preoperative sonographic features of borderline ovarian tumors.
    Exacoustos C; Romanini ME; Rinaldo D; Amoroso C; Szabolcs B; Zupi E; Arduini D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jan; 25(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 15619309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Power Doppler Index for preoperative ovarian tumors discrimination].
    Marret H; Vinatier L; Sauget S; Giraudeau B; Body G; Tranquart F
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Jun; 35(6):541-7. PubMed ID: 17540606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.