These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11283447)

  • 1. Stability and convergent validity of three physical activity assessments.
    Allor KM; Pivarnik JM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2001 Apr; 33(4):671-6. PubMed ID: 11283447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Caltrac accelerometer as a physical activity monitor for school-age children.
    Sallis JF; Buono MJ; Roby JJ; Carlson D; Nelson JA
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1990 Oct; 22(5):698-703. PubMed ID: 2233210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Caltrac versus calorimeter determination of 24-h energy expenditure in female children and adolescents.
    Bray MS; Wong WW; Morrow JR; Butte NF; Pivarnik JM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1994 Dec; 26(12):1524-30. PubMed ID: 7869888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accelerometer monitoring of home- and community-based ambulatory activity after stroke.
    Haeuber E; Shaughnessy M; Forrester LW; Coleman KL; Macko RF
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2004 Dec; 85(12):1997-2001. PubMed ID: 15605339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of heart rate and physical activity recall with doubly labeled water in obese women.
    Racette SB; Schoeller DA; Kushner RF
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1995 Jan; 27(1):126-33. PubMed ID: 7898328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physical activity related energy expenditure in children by doubly labeled water as compared with the Caltrac accelerometer.
    Johnson RK; Russ J; Goran MI
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1998 Nov; 22(11):1046-52. PubMed ID: 9822941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of activity levels using the Caltrac accelerometer and five questionnaires.
    Miller DJ; Freedson PS; Kline GM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1994 Mar; 26(3):376-82. PubMed ID: 8183104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity of uniaxial accelerometry during activities of daily living in children.
    Eisenmann JC; Strath SJ; Shadrick D; Rigsby P; Hirsch N; Jacobson L
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2004 Mar; 91(2-3):259-63. PubMed ID: 14569402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Familial aggregation in physical activity.
    Freedson PS; Evenson S
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1991 Dec; 62(4):384-9. PubMed ID: 1780560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Energy expenditure estimates of the Caltrac accelerometer for running, race walking, and stepping.
    Swan PD; Byrnes WC; Haymes EM
    Br J Sports Med; 1997 Sep; 31(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 9298560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The objective assessment of physical activity in an occupationally active group.
    Washburn RA; Cook TC; LaPorte RE
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 1989 Sep; 29(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 2635261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ability of the Caltrac accelerometer to assess daily physical activity levels.
    Richardson MT; Leon AS; Jacobs DR; Ainsworth BE; Serfass R
    J Cardiopulm Rehabil; 1995; 15(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 8542513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of three methods of estimating energy expenditure: caltrac, heart rate, and video analysis.
    Ballor DL; Burke LM; Knudson DV; Olson JR; Montoye HJ
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1989 Dec; 60(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 2489864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Walking and running energy expenditure estimated by Caltrac and indirect calorimetry.
    Haymes EM; Byrnes WC
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1993 Dec; 25(12):1365-9. PubMed ID: 8107543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective study of the reliability and convergent validity of three physical activity measures in a field research trial.
    Williams E; Klesges RC; Hanson CL; Eck LH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1989; 42(12):1161-70. PubMed ID: 2585007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of an instrument for measurement of physical activity in youth.
    Weston AT; Petosa R; Pate RR
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1997 Jan; 29(1):138-43. PubMed ID: 9000167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of energy expenditure in normal-weight and overweight women using the Caltrac Personal Activity Computer.
    Rutter S
    Int J Eat Disord; 1994 Jan; 15(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 8124325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of energy expenditure in children using the RT3 accelerometer.
    Kavouras SA; Sarras SE; Tsekouras YE; Sidossis LS
    J Sports Sci; 2008 Jul; 26(9):959-66. PubMed ID: 18569562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the TriTrac-R3D accelerometer and a self-report activity diary with heart-rate monitoring for the assessment of energy expenditure in children.
    Rodriguez G; Béghin L; Michaud L; Moreno LA; Turck D; Gottrand F
    Br J Nutr; 2002 Jun; 87(6):623-31. PubMed ID: 12067433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preliminary evaluation of a video questionnaire to assess activity levels of children.
    Tremblay MS; Inman JW; Willms JD
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2001 Dec; 33(12):2139-44. PubMed ID: 11740311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.