63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11284305)
1. ASCUS, mature metaplastic type. Cytologic diagnosis and follow-up.
Gupta D; Kannan V; Komaromy-Hiller G; Kline TS
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 11284305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical impact of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. A cytohistologic comparison.
Lousuebsakul V; Knutsen SM; Gram IT; Akin MR
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 10667155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Stratification of the risk of association with, or progression to, squamous intraepithelial lesions based on morphologic subcategorization.
Sheils LA; Wilbur DC
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(4):1065-72. PubMed ID: 9250300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Significance of a diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance for Papanicolaou smears in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.
Keating JT; Wang HH
Cancer; 2001 Apr; 93(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 11309774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Follow-up of Papanicolaou smears diagnosed as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Howell LP; Davis RL
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Feb; 14(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 8834072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the cytologic diagnosis of normal and abnormal metaplastic squamous cells in pap smears.
Gupta DK; Komaromy-Hiller G; Raab SS; Nath ME
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(5):697-703. PubMed ID: 11575646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Eliminating the diagnosis atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: impact on the accuracy of the Papanicolaou test.
Sodhani P; Gupta S; Singh V; Sehgal A; Mitra AB
Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(6):783-7. PubMed ID: 15581162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of the more restrictive definition of atypical squamous cells introduced by the 2001 Bethesda System on the sensitivity and specificity of the Papanicolaou test: a 5-year follow-up study of Papanicolaou tests originally interpreted as ASCUS, reclassified according to Bethesda 2001 criteria.
Thrall MJ; Pambuccian SE; Stelow EB; McKeon DM; Miller L; Savik K; Gulbahce HE
Cancer; 2008 Jun; 114(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 18454461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Situation analysis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance smears in Songklanagarind Hospital.
Chichareon SB; Tocharoenvanich ST
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2002 Oct; 28(5):269-73. PubMed ID: 12428697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Alanen KW; Elit LM; Molinaro PA; McLachlin CM
Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. A cytohistologic study of 52 cases.
Auger M; Charbonneau M; Arseneau J
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1671-5. PubMed ID: 9390122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in women over 55. Comparison with the general population and implications for management.
Rader AE; Rose PG; Rodriguez M; Mansbacher S; Pitlik D; Abdul-Karim FW
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 10349362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Postmenopausal squamous-cell atypias: a diagnostic challenge.
Saminathan T; Lahoti C; Kannan V; Kline TS
Diagn Cytopathol; 1994; 11(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 7867464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical significance of a cytologic diagnosis of atypical glandular cells, favor endometrial origin, in Pap smears.
Saad RS; Takei H; Liu YL; Silverman JE; Lipscomb JT; Ruiz B
Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 16514840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Atypical reparative change on cervical/vaginal smears may be associated with dysplasia.
Rimm DL; Gmitro S; Frable WJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Jun; 14(4):374-9. PubMed ID: 8725141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Follow-up of women with cervical cytological abnormalities showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a nationwide cohort study.
Sundström K; Lu D; Elfström KM; Wang J; Andrae B; Dillner J; Sparén P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):48.e1-48.e15. PubMed ID: 27457115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Should the cytologic diagnosis of "atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance" be qualified? An assessment including comparison between conventional and liquid-based technologies.
Anton RC; Ramzy I; Schwartz MR; Younes P; Chakraborty S; Mody DR
Cancer; 2001 Apr; 93(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 11309773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reporting of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance on cervical smears: is it significant?
Selvaggi SM; Haefner HK
Diagn Cytopathol; 1995 Nov; 13(4):352-6. PubMed ID: 8599925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
