These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11284644)

  • 1. Induction policy and missed post-term pregnancies: a mathematical model.
    Mongelli M; Wong YC; Venkat A; Chua TM
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2001 Feb; 41(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 11284644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gestational age and induction of labour for prolonged pregnancy.
    Gardosi J; Vanner T; Francis A
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Jul; 104(7):792-7. PubMed ID: 9236643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating the date of confinement: ultrasonographic biometry versus certain menstrual dates.
    Mongelli M; Wilcox M; Gardosi J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jan; 174(1 Pt 1):278-81. PubMed ID: 8572021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prolonged and post-term pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).
    Vayssière C; Haumonte JB; Chantry A; Coatleven F; Debord MP; Gomez C; Le Ray C; Lopez E; Salomon LJ; Senat MV; Sentilhes L; Serry A; Winer N; Grandjean H; Verspyck E; Subtil D;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jul; 169(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 23434325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The research implications of the selection of a gestational age estimation method.
    Lynch CD; Zhang J
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():86-96. PubMed ID: 17803622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of ultrasound-estimated date of delivery in 17,450 spontaneous singleton births: do we need to modify Naegele's rule?
    Nguyen TH; Larsen T; Engholm G; Møller H
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jul; 14(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 10461334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Expected day of delivery from ultrasound dating versus last menstrual period--obstetric outcome when dates mismatch.
    Thorsell M; Kaijser M; Almström H; Andolf E
    BJOG; 2008 Apr; 115(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 18333938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Role of ultrasound in elective abortions].
    Wylomanski S; Winer N
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Dec; 45(10):1477-1489. PubMed ID: 27814980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determinants of number-specific recall error of last menstrual period: a retrospective cohort study.
    van Oppenraaij R; Eilers P; Willemsen SP; van Dunné FM; Exalto N; Steegers E
    BJOG; 2015 May; 122(6):835-841. PubMed ID: 25040796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sonographic dating of pregnancies among women with menstrual irregularities.
    Waldenström U; Axelsson O; Nilsson S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1991; 70(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 1858490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability and validity of last menstrual period for gestational age estimation in a low-to-middle-income setting.
    Macaulay S; Buchmann EJ; Dunger DB; Norris SA
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Jan; 45(1):217-225. PubMed ID: 30191629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Blinded ultrasound fetal biometry at 36 weeks and risk of emergency Cesarean delivery in a prospective cohort study of low-risk nulliparous women.
    Sovio U; Smith GCS
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 28452133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of Reference Charts for Mid-Trimester Fetal Biometry.
    van de Kamp K; Pajkrt E; Zwinderman AH; van der Post JA; Snijders RJM
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2019; 45(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 29533928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lower accuracy in prediction of delivery date in Stockholm County following introduction of new guidelines.
    Wessel H; Nyberg T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Feb; 96(2):223-232. PubMed ID: 27858960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Should a first trimester dating scan be routine for all pregnancies?
    Doubilet PM
    Semin Perinatol; 2013 Oct; 37(5):307-9. PubMed ID: 24176152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Ultrasonographic and clinical methods in the management of prolonged pregnancy].
    Rosati P; Ciliberti P; Buongiorno S; Alessio A; Mappa I; Guariglia L; Capelli G; Scambia G
    Minerva Ginecol; 2014 Apr; 66(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 24848077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A direct method for ultrasound prediction of day of delivery: a new, population-based approach.
    Gjessing HK; Grøttum P; Eik-Nes SH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 30(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 17557369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biparietal diameter and crown-rump length in fetuses with Down's syndrome: implications for antenatal serum screening for Down's syndrome.
    Wald NJ; Smith D; Kennard A; Palomaki GE; Salonen R; Holzgreve W; Pejtsik B; Coombes EJ; Mancini G; MacRae AR
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 May; 100(5):430-5. PubMed ID: 8518242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between detection of the cervical gland area during the late third trimester and necessity for induction of labor to prevent post-term delivery.
    Minami Y; Sekiya T; Nishizawa H; Miyazaki J; Noda Y; Ishii R; Yasue A; Nishio E; Udagawa Y; Fujii T
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2014 Oct; 41(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 27278027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate by third-trimester fetal biometry and impact of ultrasound-delivery interval.
    Reboul Q; Delabaere A; Luo ZC; Nuyt AM; Wu Y; Chauleur C; Fraser W; Audibert F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 27153518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.